Everyone wants to find a “100x gem”. The problem is, most people don’t even know how to tell the difference between a good project and one that’s just good at marketing.

Before buying a token, I always ask three things.
First, does this project truly solve a real problem, or is it just swapping in buzzwords like “AI”, “RWA”, or “DeFi” to attract investors?
Second, what is the token distribution like? If most of the supply is controlled by the team or early investors, the sell pressure after listing can be very high.
Third, is the community growing organically? A lot of followers doesn’t necessarily mean active users. A community that discusses, builds, and provides feedback is far more valuable than an account that only replies “GM” every day.
In crypto, technology is important. But tokenomics, utility, and the quality of the community often determine whether a project can survive after the hype dies down.
If you could choose only one factor when evaluating a crypto project, which would you trust more: technology, the community, or tokenomics? Explain why. I want to read different viewpoints.