Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
Stock CFD Derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
3.8%
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
Sometimes when I check data, I find that the Subgraph is getting stuck—an “RPC rate limit” error pops up or the indexer is lagging. Honestly, this is pretty common—not because the chain isn’t working, but because your query frequency is too high, or the Subgraph update hasn’t caught up with the latest blocks yet.
I’ve been thinking about it for a while, and I’ve found that many so-called “data getting stuck” issues are actually scheduling problems on the indexer side. Especially now that a bunch of projects have adopted the re-staking setup with “shared security”—logically it’s a nesting/daisy-chaining structure, but is there a technical problem? Not really. It’s just that the maintenance cost is high. Anyway, I’d rather spend more time tuning my own query frequency, or write a lightweight indexer myself, than expect a third party to stay smooth and reliable all the time.
There are many tutorials, but the ones I can actually follow are the ones that focus on software engineering habits—define your data sources first, then think about caching, and don’t assume infinite RPC from the start. Sometimes it’s not that the data is breaking; it’s that you didn’t build proper fault tolerance. Don’t ask why other people can run just as fast as you—check first whether you’re the one constantly spamming the same endpoint at the same time.
Anyway, that’s about it. Before you go look up data, first see how you’re querying—fixing your own approach is more effective than yelling at the service provider.