#Gate事件合约首发狂欢 #辣妹儿李嘉欣 Next I’m going to hype up a bit. This slightly dirty statement is mainly meant to convey two things. First, in a trade where the market had absolutely no mistakes, how much money can you make relies on yourself. Second, have you ever seen someone trade with a “God’s-eye view” in the middle of a market move?



This trade is on a 4-hour level or higher, and in an uptrend below the daily timeframe. In the two lower-grade consolidation zones, one is a bottoming consolidation zone, and the other is a rising consolidation zone. Both consolidation zones share a common trait: at least three legs. After those three legs, I don’t know how many more legs you can do, but after the final leg you leave the consolidation zone, you leave it upward. So when you’re forming another consolidation zone, I can’t control how many times you “scratch” it, but after you exceed three legs there will always be one time where you have to stop out. After that stop-out, since you leave upward, you’re definitely going to go long—so that’s why I don’t do short trades.

Besides the two consolidations, there’s also an upward channel. I don’t look at playing channels. It’s nothing more than drawing two lines—too hard for me—so I won’t comment on this channel.

During the rally in this trade, without any pattern showing up—do you think it’s difficult? Do you think it’s simple? Do you think you made money?

After the recap, next comes the hype segment: why do I say you’re trading from a God’s-eye view. On June 30 at 11:30, when the BTC price was 60,000, I told you very clearly: after the breakout of the 58,000–61,000 range, chase longs; then enter the next range, 61,800–64,000; and within this range, do the same up-and-down “piston movement” as you did in 58,000–61,000. Both are also at least three legs. I don’t know how many legs you can do after three legs, but the last time you leave the trade is still leaving upward. The target is 65,500. On this leave-the-trade move, if anyone shorts you’re the one who has to take the stop-loss. Whoever wants to short can—go ahead, do whatever. I won’t.

Now you’re looking at this rally chart—tell me yourself: haven’t you been bouncing around a trade structure in the 61,800–64,000 range several times? Tell me—did you know ahead of time this走势? I didn’t tell you ahead of time, did I?

Then we continue the hype. With the target of leaving the trade at 65,500, I used “A galloping red dust imperial concubine smiles; no one knows the arrival of lychees” to mock the technical-big-shot bulls for being short-sighted. I said: you can call your goal “Fengxian,” but if you only end up getting “Kunshan,” then that’s not a goal, right? Did 65,500 give you anything? That’s not the key. The most badass part is: I didn’t tell you to short at 65,500. I just knew this spot had meaning. Didn’t I say to short at 67,000, right? You tell me—think about it: in each step, don’t you at least know a week in advance what you’re going to do? Don’t you trade with a God’s-eye view?

Let me say it one more time: about 67,000! I’m joking when I say who to blame, who to blame. I’m just someone with a bit of skill—quite a lot of people like to talk and argue. I’m just teasing. I could have stayed silent at 67,000, not saying a word, and waited for the market to drop—then come out and say I shorted. Even the 61,800 part—I didn’t mention that either. Since I didn’t get in, just move to the next 대응方案 and that’s it. But it doesn’t stop me from mocking others. You can say I didn’t get to eat the meat, but you can’t say I’m wrong.

Alright, next question. Now take a look at the last screenshot. The 61,800 target position—I said it first across the whole network, remember. I gave you the long position. And 60,800—also that’s what I said first. Don’t end up claiming it later as if it’s yours.
View Original
post-image
post-image
post-image
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 1
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
Certainly
· 2h ago
Careful—still not asleep?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pinned