ZhiYi LunBi Course 20 for Newbies: How to Avoid Getting Tricked

Can you really trust big V trade calls?

“This coin, I think it’ll go up tenfold.”

For newbies, when you see lines like this, the hardest part is often not that you don’t believe it—it’s that you’re afraid you’ll miss out. When you scroll and see the comment section full of excitement, and the price has already started moving, it’s easy to take someone else’s single judgment as the reason for your own order.

What big V says may not all be fake, but you must first see one thing: by the time he says it, and by the time you see it, it may not be the same position, and it may not be the same kind of risk.

When did he buy it, what was his cost, how large is his position, and how long does he plan to hold—usually you don’t know. He can use a small position to test, but you might, because you’re afraid of missing once, end up putting up most of your funds. Even if the overall direction ends up right, a normal pullback in the middle is enough to make you panic and exit at the lowest point.

So when I see a recommendation, I don’t start by asking “Is he right or not.” I ask why this coin is worth buying. Where does the demand come from? Can the token capture the project’s value? Is there obvious pressure from token supply and unlocks? These questions can’t be replaced by the recommender’s fan count.

You also need to distinguish whether what he said is a fact or a judgment. Facts that can be checked include product launch, changes in revenue, and token unlocks. “It’s about to take off” and “the whales are going to pump it” are just judgments. Even facts can be selectively presented, while judgments are more likely to change with market conditions. If you only remember the conclusion and don’t know the basis, you can’t tell when it’s time to exit.

Some people use past cases where they called it right to prove themselves, but they rarely put the recommendations that didn’t pump, got deleted, or left people stuck for the long term together for review. What you see is the outcome that’s been shown; it may not be the full record. Posting one time of high returns can’t prove that the risks are controlled every time.

ZhiYi LunBi does in-depth research to answer “Is this coin worth touching?” It also verifies major news to determine whether the facts in a recommendation can stand up. They can’t guarantee every judgment will be correct, but they can make your decision rely less on one person’s volume.

The viewpoints you can truly refer to should allow you to see the evidence, the risks, and the conditions under which the judgment fails. It’s not the most important thing who you listen to. What matters is: if you block out his name, does this reason still hold?

If you’re currently stuck on a coin recommended by some big V, comment the coin name and the core reason he gave. Let’s turn “who to believe” into “what to verify.”