Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
Stock CFD Derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
3.8%
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
#SECWarnsOnChainLendingMayFallUnderSecuritiesLaw
SEC hints at On-Chain Lending still within the purview of Securities Law
The regulatory discourse around Decentralized Finance (DeFi) continues to be an unfolding narrative. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce recently made remarks that emphasized that transposing financial activity onto the blockchain will not necessarily mean it is automatically outside of the purview of U.S. Securities laws.
The commentary refers to the role of crypto vaults and on-chain lending protocols that rely on active operators or developers to manage users’ assets. Peirce indicated that where there is exercise of discretion-such as choice of yield strategies, asset allocation, or investment decisions-the platform may invoke regulations within federal securities laws.
This will similarly be the case for some lending protocols. Aspects such as determination of interest rates, collateral eligible for lending and collateral liquidation threshold or active management of lending strategy, if determined to fit within the structure, may invoke SEC's regulation. Certain lending mechanisms or structures of vaults could also be viewed as investment contracts, enterprise or investment company.
It is noteworthy that the "existence of technology" in itself will not render any product under regulatory framework. The focus of the regulator will be how the product functions, who is taking all the key decisions and if user is dependent on other's managerial expertise to generate profits.
On the contrary, Commissioner Peirce urged industry players to communicate directly with the SEC about potential rule changes and a much-needed clearer regulatory framework. The remarks from Commissioner Peirce suggests that discussions between the SEC and crypto players are crucial for developing future regulatory framework.
This can be viewed as a reminder to all DeFi developers, investors, and users that Decentralization does exist in a scale, and that minimal or zero human intervention in the products, can attract different kind of regulatory considerations compared to active manager.
Finding the balance between the innovation and investor protection will be one of the key challenges to all blockchain projects as well as regulators.
Do you believe that clearer regulation could improve the DeFi sector, or will stricter compliance requirements hinder the innovation process?
#DeFi #SEC #GateSquare