Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
Stock CFD Derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
3.8%
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
#夏日创作营 US stock market trend analysis: The key for the next year is not simply to judge whether the US stocks will rise or fall
RBC’s latest US equities outlook: Technology becomes the main line again; S&P 500 target 8,150 points in the next 12 months
In its latest published US stock strategy report, RBC Capital Markets has made a clear shift in its allocation recommendations across S&P 500 sectors.
The core signal released by the report is: RBC still favors the US stock market over the coming year, but the market’s upside path will not be smooth. The investment focus may shift again—from value stocks, small-cap stocks, and non-US markets—back to US large-cap technology, artificial intelligence, and mega-cap growth stocks.
In terms of sector allocation, RBC raised the Information Technology sector from “neutral weight” to “overweight,” while increasing Consumer Discretionary from “underweight” to “neutral.” In contrast, Communication Services was cut from “overweight” to “neutral,” and Utilities was reduced from “neutral” to “underweight.”
After the adjustment, RBC’s current three overweight sectors are Information Technology, Financials, and Materials.
Technology becomes the preferred growth sector again
RBC’s most important change this time is to re-establish Information Technology as the preferred growth sector. Over the past month or so, the technology sector has lagged the S&P 500 at times due to profit-taking from AI leaders, pressure on semiconductor valuations, and rotation in market style. But from a fundamentals perspective, technology companies’ earnings and revenue expectations remain among the strongest across all sectors, and capital has started flowing back into technology funds.
More importantly, RBC believes that although the technology sector’s overall valuation is not cheap, it is only slightly above its long-term average and has not reached a level of broad, out-of-control excess. Considering that technology stocks’ market capitalization share in the S&P 500 has already exceeded one-third, if investors continue to remain bullish on the S&P 500’s performance over the next year, it is hard to simultaneously be bearish on the technology sector. Opportunities within technology are not identical either.
RBC thinks that, for software, IT services, and also technology hardware, storage, and peripherals, the industries currently have both favorable trends in earnings revisions and relatively attractive valuations. Among them, the software sector’s valuation is already close to historical lows, but earnings expectations remain strongly upward, and the risk-reward profile is improving. By comparison, the semiconductor industry’s earnings growth is still very strong, but valuations remain at historical highs. Even with some recent adjustment, RBC still reminds investors that profit-taking in AI and semiconductor “hot stocks” can’t be ruled out again later in the year.
Excessive pessimism may already be in Consumer
RBC raised Consumer Discretionary from underweight to neutral, which does not mean it believes US consumers have fully recovered. Instead, RBC thinks the market’s pessimism toward the consumer sector may already be excessive.
At present, US consumer confidence remains weak, but some survey data show signs of stabilization. Historical experience suggests that when consumer confidence at the University of Michigan starts to rise, Consumer Discretionary and Consumer Staples tend to achieve relatively better returns. From an earnings standpoint, Consumer Discretionary’s earnings revisions are roughly balanced; although valuations are not low, they are not clearly expensive enough to justify continuing to be underweighted.
RBC believes that in sub-industries such as auto parts, diversified consumer services, and specialty retail, more opportunities are starting to appear. Therefore, this adjustment looks more like a repair targeted at “excessive pessimism,” rather than a strong bullish call on the consumer cycle.
Financials and Materials remain overweight
Aside from technology, RBC continues to overweight Financials and Materials. The Financials sector is one of the highest-rated sectors in RBC analysts’ surveys.
Analysts generally look favorably on the financial industry’s performance over the next 6 to 12 months and maintain a positive stance toward sector valuation, demand, and the US domestic policy environment. At the same time, earnings and revenue expectations for the financial sector are improving, and capital flows have turned positive. Banks, insurance, and consumer finance are the sub-sectors RBC considers relatively most attractive.
For capital markets businesses where investment banks like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley operate, RBC is comparatively cautious.
The capital markets sector is not currently the most attractive direction within financials. However, its valuation is already clearly lower than last year, no longer sitting in obviously expensive territory. If M&A, IPOs, securities issuance, and private credit activity continue to recover, capital markets businesses may still benefit.
Materials also remains overweight. Its main advantage is relatively lower valuations; earnings and revenue expectations have turned positive again, and capital flows are starting to stabilize as well. Metals and mining and chemicals are among the more closely watched areas.
Energy fundamentals are strong, but cash flow remains the obstacle
The Energy sector was once an area RBC considered upgrading to overweight.
From a fundamentals perspective, the Energy sector’s earnings and revenue revisions are strong, its valuations are relatively cheap, and analysts generally maintain a positive view on demand, the policy environment, and future performance. At the same time, amid ongoing global geopolitical uncertainty, energy stocks can provide some portfolio “insurance” effect. However, RBC ultimately keeps Energy at neutral allocation, mainly because energy funds have recently experienced notably large outflows. This means RBC is not dismissing Energy, but instead believes there is currently a lack of sufficient confirmation from the capital-flow side. Once capital flows improve again, Energy could become one of the next sectors to be upgraded.
Industrials: solid fundamentals, but valuations are already too high
Industrials’ earnings and revenue expectations remain strong. Manufacturing activity, infrastructure investment, supply-chain restructuring, and AI infrastructure capital expenditures all provide long-term support for related companies. However, Industrials has already become one of the most expensive sectors in the S&P 500 by valuation, and the stronger inflows of capital it previously received have started to weaken.
Therefore, while RBC acknowledges its fundamentals, it temporarily keeps Industrials at neutral and does not recommend chasing further upside at these high valuation levels. Within Industrials, specialty services have relatively more attractive valuations and earnings revisions. Areas such as electrical equipment and construction and engineering may still have strong earnings trends, but their valuations have clearly risen.
Utilities cut to underweight
Utilities is the clearest underweight direction in this round of adjustments. Although Utilities’ earnings and revenue expectations continue to improve, RBC believes the sector currently has three main problems: valuation is too high, capital flows are too weak, and analysts lack enough confidence in future performance. In addition, as US midterm elections gradually approach, electricity prices and cost of living affordability could become policy focal points, which could create potential pressure on utilities companies’ pricing power and earnings expectations. As a result, RBC cut Utilities from neutral to underweight.
Within the sector, only independent power producers and renewable energy producers are relatively more attractive in terms of valuation and earnings revisions.
S&P 500 target for the next 12 months remains 8,150 points
On its overall market view, RBC keeps its target level of 8,150 points for the S&P 500 over the next 12 months. Based on the index level at the time the model is locked, this implies roughly 10.8% upside potential.
RBC’s core logic is that over the next year, US corporate earnings growth—especially for AI-related companies—can offset, to some extent, the negative impacts brought by rising interest rates, inflation pressure, and valuation contraction. Its valuation model assumes that the future S&P 500 price-to-earnings ratio gradually declines to around 24x, while applying a 5% haircut to the market’s consensus earnings expectations. Under assumptions of inflation around 3%, one Fed rate hike, and a 10-year US Treasury yield of about 4.5%, the model’s implied fair value for the S&P 500 is about 8,162 points, which is basically consistent with the official target of 8,150 points.
Therefore, RBC’s view for the coming year is not “valuations keep expanding endlessly.” Instead, RBC believes that earnings growth can drive the index higher even as valuations contract modestly.
Earnings growth in Q2 remains strong
Currently, the market expects S&P 500 component stocks’ earnings per share to grow year over year by about 24% in 2026’s second quarter. Although this is lower than the roughly 30% growth pace in Q1, it is still at a very strong level. Among companies that released financial results early, about 94% posted earnings above market expectations, higher than Q1’s 84%; but the proportion of companies with revenue above expectations is about 65%, lower than Q1’s 80%. This result suggests that US corporate profit performance remains strong, but the breadth of growth is not as optimistic as earnings numbers alone may suggest. Some companies may be delivering better-than-expected earnings through cost control, margin expansion, or capital-structure optimization, rather than relying entirely on rapid revenue growth.
Even more worth watching is that the trend of upward revisions to overall S&P 500 earnings expectations has recently weakened, but this weakening is mainly concentrated among the other 490 companies outside the top 10. For the top 10 S&P 500 companies by market value, the proportion of earnings expectation upgrades is currently around 90%, nearing historical highs. This indicates that mega-cap companies still hold a clear earnings advantage. Market leadership may shift back to large-cap growth stocks
So far this year, the market has experienced multiple style rotations. Value stocks, small caps, non-US markets, and companies with lower weight within the S&P 500 have all outperformed large-cap tech and mega-cap growth stocks at certain times. RBC thinks this kind of market “broadening rally” may continue in the near term, but it is more like a phase of trading rather than a fundamental change in long-term leadership.
Conditions for large-cap growth stocks to regain leadership are gradually forming.
First, profit growth from AI-related companies and the “Seven Tech Titans” over the next few years is still expected to be higher than that of other companies in the S&P 500.
Second, earnings expectations for the top 10 companies in the S&P 500 are improving again, while earnings revisions for other companies are starting to cool off.
Third, after recent adjustments, valuation pressure on large-cap technology stocks has already eased much more than previously.
RBC’s valuation model shows that the relative P/E of the S&P 500’s top 10 companies can already be explained by their long-term earnings growth advantage and is no longer as clearly overvalued as before. Therefore, RBC is warning that the market may be shifting back toward US stocks, the technology sector, AI themes, and mega-cap growth stocks.
Small-cap rallies may continue, but durability needs monitoring
The Russell 2000 has recently clearly outperformed the S&P 500, and small caps have also broken upward out of the previous trading range. Factors supporting small caps include improved manufacturing and employment data, positioning with high short exposure in the market, and the possibility that 2027 earnings growth could accelerate noticeably. Based on consensus expectations, small caps’ profit growth in 2027 is expected to exceed the S&P 500 overall and some AI leaders. However, RBC is not turning fully toward small caps as a result.
After the Russell 2000’s index annual reconstitution, valuations have come down from high levels, but they are currently only near the long-term average level and still not at an extremely attractive level. At the same time, small caps are more sensitive to financing costs and changes in interest rates. If the market reprices the risk of Fed hikes again, or if funds return to mega-cap technology stocks, small caps’ relative performance could be suppressed. Therefore, small caps still have opportunities in the short term, but for now they are unlikely to replace large-cap technology stocks as the long-term core main theme.
Potential pullbacks may be limited to 5% to 10%
Although RBC continues to like the market’s outlook over the next year, it does not believe the upside will be a straight line. As long as the US economy does not fall into a recession and the Fed does not launch a large-scale rate-hike cycle, RBC expects the normal pullback range for the S&P 500 is likely to be between 5% and 10%. Risks that could trigger a pullback include deterioration of Middle East geopolitical conditions, downward revisions to 2027 earnings forecasts, overly optimistic earnings expectations for AI and semiconductors, policy repricing triggered by midterm elections, and further increases in US Treasury yields. Especially worth watching is the 10-year US Treasury yield. If yields simply stay near current high levels, the stock market can still digest it; but if they keep breaking above 5%, or if the Fed enters a stronger hiking cycle, the market correction could exceed the typical 5% to 10% range.
Conclusion
RBC’s key takeaways from its latest report can be summarized as: the bull-market logic for US stocks is not over yet, but investors need to refocus on earnings quality and sector selection. Technology, Financials, and Materials remain RBC’s top three favored sectors. Pessimistic expectations for Consumer Discretionary may have been overdone and there is some room for repair. Energy has both attractive fundamentals and valuations, but capital flows still need to improve. Industrials has strong earnings, but valuations are too high. Utilities has been cut to underweight due to valuation and policy risks. From the market style perspective, rotations among small caps, value stocks, and non-US markets over the past period may not be fully finished yet, but the earnings advantages of large-cap tech, AI, and mega-cap growth stocks remain clearly visible.
As technology stock valuations gradually correct, market leadership is approaching a new turning point. For investors, the key for the coming year is not simply deciding whether US stocks will rise or fall, but finding sectors and companies whose earnings can keep delivering sustainably, whose valuations are relatively reasonable, and that also have capital support—while the index still has room to rise.
RBC latest US equities outlook: Tech becomes the main theme again; S&P 500 target of 8,150 points for the next 12 months
In its latest published US stock strategy report, RBC Capital Markets made clear adjustments to its allocation recommendations across major S&P 500 sectors.
The report’s core signal is: RBC still likes the US stock market over the next year, but the path of market gains will not be smooth. The investment mainline may shift again from value stocks, small caps, and non-US markets back to US large-cap tech, artificial intelligence, and mega-cap growth stocks.
On sector allocation, RBC raised the Information Technology sector from “neutral” to “overweight,” while lifting Consumer Discretionary from “underweight” to “neutral.” In contrast, Communication Services was cut from “overweight” to “neutral,” and Utilities was reduced from “neutral” to “underweight.”
After the adjustments, the three sectors RBC currently has at “overweight” are Information Technology, Financials, and Materials.
Tech returns as the preferred growth segment. RBC’s most important change this time is to re-establish Information Technology as the preferred growth segment. Over the past month or more, the tech sector has lagged the S&P 500 at times due to profit-taking in AI bellwethers, semiconductor valuation pressure, and rotations in market style. But from a fundamentals perspective, tech companies’ earnings and revenue expectations remain among the strongest across all sectors, and capital has started flowing back into tech funds.
More importantly, RBC believes that although the tech sector’s overall valuation is not cheap, it is only slightly above its long-term average and has not reached an out-of-control level. Given that tech stocks’ market-cap share in the S&P 500 is already above one third, if investors remain bullish on the S&P 500’s performance over the next year, it is difficult to be bearish on the tech sector at the same time. Opportunities within tech are also not identical.
RBC thinks Software, IT services, and tech hardware, storage, and peripherals currently have both favorable earnings-revision trends and attractive relative valuations. Among them, the Software sector’s valuation is close to historical lows, but earnings expectations remain strongly upward; its risk-reward is improving. By comparison, the semiconductor industry still has very strong earnings growth, but valuations remain at historical highs. Even with recent pullbacks, RBC reminds investors that there is no guarantee within the year that profit-taking won’t happen again in AI and semiconductor “hot” stocks.
Consumer sentiment may be overly pessimistic. RBC lifted Consumer Discretionary from underweight to neutral, but that does not mean RBC thinks US consumers have fully recovered. Instead, RBC believes market pessimism about the consumer sector may already be excessive.
At present, US consumer confidence is still relatively weak, but some survey data show signs of stabilizing. Historical experience suggests that when University of Michigan consumer confidence starts to rise, both consumer discretionary and consumer staples tend to capture relatively favorable returns. From an earnings perspective, the earnings revisions in the consumer discretionary sector are roughly balanced. Valuation is not low, but it is not clearly so expensive that it must remain underweighted.
RBC also believes that in sub-sectors such as auto parts, diversified consumer services, and specialty retail, there are starting to be more opportunities worth watching. Therefore, this adjustment looks more like a “repair” from excessive pessimism rather than a strong bullish call on the consumer cycle.
Financials and Materials remain overweight. Other than tech, RBC continues to overweight Financials and Materials. Financials is one of the best-rated sectors in RBC analysts’ surveys.
Analysts generally like the financial industry’s outlook for the next 6 to 12 months and hold a positive view on sector valuations, demand, and the US domestic policy environment. At the same time, earnings and revenue expectations for the financial sector are improving, and capital flows have turned positive. Banks, insurance, and consumer finance are the sub-segments RBC considers relatively most attractive.
For capital markets businesses at investment banks such as Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, RBC is comparatively cautious.
Capital markets is not the most attractive direction within the financial industry right now, but its valuation is already clearly below last year and is no longer in an obviously expensive state. If M&A, IPOs, securities issuance, and private credit activity continue to pick up, capital markets business could still benefit.
Materials also remains overweight. Its main advantage is relatively lower valuation, with earnings and revenue expectations turning positive again, and capital flows starting to stabilize. Metals and mining, and chemicals are among the more watched directions. Energy fundamentals are strong, but capital flows remain a constraint. Energy was at one point an object RBC considered upgrading to overweight.
From a fundamentals perspective, the energy sector has strong earnings and revenue revisions, relatively cheap valuation, and analysts generally take a positive view of demand, the policy environment, and future performance. Meanwhile, amid ongoing global geopolitical uncertainty, energy stocks can also provide some portfolio “insurance” effect. However, RBC ultimately keeps the energy sector at neutral allocation, mainly because there have been notably clear capital outflows from energy funds recently. That means RBC is not denying the energy sector; rather, it believes there is currently insufficient confirmation from the capital-flow side. Once capital flows improve again, energy could become one of the next sectors to be upgraded.
The industrial sector has good fundamentals, but valuation is already too high. Industrial sector earnings and revenue expectations remain robust; manufacturing activity, infrastructure investment, supply-chain reshaping, and AI infrastructure capital expenditures all provide long-term support for related companies. However, the industrial sector has already become one of the most expensive sectors by valuation within the S&P 500, and the previously strong capital inflows have started to weaken.
Therefore, while RBC acknowledges its fundamentals, it temporarily maintains neutral allocation and does not recommend chasing upside at these elevated valuation levels.
Within industrials, the professional services industry has relatively more attractive valuation and earnings-revision dynamics. Areas such as electrical equipment and building & engineering still have strong earnings trends, but valuations have clearly risen. Utilities was cut to underweight. Utilities is the clearest underweight direction in this round of adjustments. Although utilities’ earnings and revenue expectations continue to improve, RBC believes the sector currently faces three main problems: valuation is too high, capital flows are too weak, and analysts lack sufficient confidence in future performance.
In addition, as US midterm elections approach, the affordability of electricity prices and living costs could become a policy focus, which may create potential pressure on utilities companies’ pricing power and earnings expectations. As a result, RBC cut utilities from neutral to underweight. Within the sector, only independent power producers and renewable energy producers are relatively more attractive in terms of valuation and earnings revisions.
S&P 500 target of 8,150 points remains. On the overall market view, RBC maintains its S&P 500 target of 8,150 points for the next 12 months. Based on the index level at the time the model locks, this implies roughly 10.8% upside potential.
RBC’s core logic is that over the next year, US corporate earnings growth—especially for AI-related companies—can, to some extent, offset the negative impacts from rising interest rates, inflation pressure, and valuation contraction. Its valuation model assumes that the S&P 500 P/E ratio gradually falls to about 24x, and it applies a 5% haircut to market consensus earnings expectations. Under assumptions of inflation around 3%, one Fed rate hike, and a 10-year US Treasury yield of about 4.5%, the model yields a reasonable value for the S&P 500 of about 8,162 points, which is broadly consistent with the official target of 8,150 points.
Therefore, RBC’s view for the coming year is not “valuations expand indefinitely,” but rather that earnings growth can push the index higher even as valuations contract slightly.
Second-quarter earnings growth still strong. The market currently expects S&P 500 constituent companies’ earnings per share in 2Q 2026 to grow year over year by about 24%. While this is lower than the roughly 30% pace in 1Q, it is still at a very strong level. Among companies that have reported early, about 94% had earnings above market expectations, up from 84% in 1Q. However, the proportion of companies with revenues above expectations is about 65%, down from 80% in 1Q. This result suggests that US corporate profits remain strong, but the breadth of growth is not as optimistic as the earnings numbers alone might indicate. Some companies may deliver upside earnings through cost control, margin improvement, or capital-structure optimization, rather than relying entirely on rapid revenue growth.
More worth noting is that the trend of upward revisions to overall S&P 500 earnings expectations has recently weakened, though this weakening is mainly concentrated among the other 490 companies outside the top 10. For the S&P 500’s top 10 by market value, the upward revision proportion for earnings expectations is currently about 90%, already near historical highs. This indicates that mega-cap companies still have a clear earnings advantage.
Market leadership may return to large growth stocks. Since the start of this year, the market has gone through multiple style switches. Value stocks, small caps, non-US markets, and companies with relatively lower weights in the S&P 500 have all outperformed large tech and mega-cap growth stocks at various times. RBC believes this kind of “market breadth” rally may still persist in the short term, but it looks more like episodic trading rather than a fundamental change in long-term leadership.
Conditions for large growth stocks to regain leadership are gradually forming.
First, earnings growth over the next few years for AI-related companies and the “Magnificent Seven” is expected to remain higher than for other companies in the S&P 500.
Second, earnings expectations for the top 10 companies in the S&P 500 have improved again, while earnings revisions for other companies are starting to cool.
Third, after recent pullbacks, valuation pressure on large tech stocks has eased noticeably compared with earlier levels.
RBC’s valuation model shows that the relative P/E for the S&P 500’s top 10 companies can now be explained by their long-term earnings-growth advantage, and they are no longer as clearly overvalued as they were earlier. As a result, RBC is on alert that the market could shift back toward US stocks, the tech sector, AI themes, and mega-cap growth stocks.
The small-cap rally may continue, but its durability needs monitoring. Russell 2000 has recently clearly outperformed the S&P 500, and small caps have broken upward out of the prior trading range. Factors supporting small caps include improved manufacturing and employment data, high levels of short positioning in the market, and an expectation that earnings growth in 2027 could accelerate meaningfully. According to market consensus expectations, small-cap profit growth in 2027 is expected to exceed both the overall S&P 500 and some AI bellwethers. Still, RBC does not fully pivot to small caps. After the Russell 2000 index annual adjustment, its valuation has already fallen back from the high end, but it is currently only near the long-term average and has not reached a level that is extremely attractive. At the same time, small caps are more sensitive to financing costs and changes in interest rates. If the market reprices the risk of additional Fed hikes, or capital returns to mega-cap tech stocks, the relative performance of small caps could be pressured. Therefore, small caps still have cyclical opportunities, but for now they are unlikely to replace large tech as the long-term core mainline.
Pullbacks may be capped at 5% to 10%. While RBC continues to like the market’s outlook for the next year, it does not think the upside path will be a straight line. As long as the US economy does not fall into recession and the Fed does not launch a large-scale rate-hike cycle, RBC expects the typical correction range for the S&P 500 is likely to be between 5% and 10%. Risks that could trigger a pullback include worsening Middle East geopolitical conditions, downward revisions to 2027 earnings forecasts, overly optimistic AI and semiconductor earnings expectations, policy repricing triggered by midterm elections, and further increases in US Treasury yields. Of particular note is the 10-year US Treasury yield. If yields merely stay near current high levels, the equity market still has the capacity to absorb them. But if yields continue breaking above 5%, or the Fed enters a stronger rate-hike cycle, the market adjustment could exceed the ordinary 5% to 10% range.
Conclusion
The core takeaways from RBC’s latest report can be summarized as: the logic behind the US stock bull market is not over, but investors need to re-emphasize earnings quality and sector selection. Tech, Financials, and Materials remain RBC’s top three preferred sectors. Pessimistic expectations for Consumer Discretionary may already be excessive and there is some room for a rebound. Energy has attractive fundamentals and valuation, but investors still need to wait for improved capital flows. Industrials have strong earnings, but valuation is too high. Utilities has been cut to underweight due to valuation and policy risks. From the perspective of market style, the sector rotation among small caps, value stocks, and non-US markets over the past period may not be fully finished yet, but the earnings advantage of large tech, AI, and mega-cap growth stocks remains clear.
As tech stock valuations continue to correct, market leadership is approaching a new turning point. For investors, the key for the next year isn’t just deciding whether US stocks will go up or down, but rather finding sectors and companies where earnings can be sustained and delivered, valuations remain relatively reasonable, and there is supportive capital behind them while the index still has room to rise.