Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110


【Plain-language guide】This article deeply discusses the passage of BIP 110 (a data-slicing temporary soft fork), and argues for steadfastly upholding Bitcoin’s neutrality and hard consensus.
While firmly proposing the original intent, it also points out that its voting purpose would undermine permissionless innovation, sacrifice upgrade flexibility, and set a dangerous precedent.
It calls on the article to return to market and self-directed strategies, reject aggressive governance, and act as a guardian of neutral rules.
For details, see:
BTC-1.21%
View Original
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned