Just came across a chain game project—its economic model collapsed so cleanly that it’s almost unbelievable. Inflation hit like a tiger, there were more studio staff than players, and the coin price basically spiraled straight up to the sky. LOL. I’ve seen too many scripts like this, so it’s really not surprising.



But lately, because of this, I’ve started thinking again about the boundaries between on-chain privacy and compliance. Honestly, how high should ordinary users’ expectations for privacy really be? I’m conflicted, to say the least. On one hand, the “airdrop hunters” are most afraid of getting checked by “witches,” and they want to clean their addresses spotless. On the other hand, I’m also worried that one day new rules will come out, and those “little smart moves” from the past will become black history. My approach right now is: don’t leave too much meaningless talk on public chains, be careful with signatures and approvals—if I can expose less, I’ll expose less.

Anyway, I’ve calmed my mind. Just do what I can do—don’t overthink it. Win or lose as fate decides; just wait for mining slowly.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned