Recently, re-staking and shared security have become popular again, and everyone is calculating "yield stacking," but frankly, don't treat the risks as air and ignore them... The same security being borrowed multiple times could lead to the same sword falling when something goes wrong.

This morning, I checked on-chain data and saw some projects' TVL / participation addresses increasing rapidly, but their active validation / penalty mechanisms are rather vague, which makes me a bit cautious.

Airdrop season is also quite surreal; task platforms are becoming more and more strict against anti-witching, and the points system has turned yield farmers into clock-in workers. As a result, many people are stacking more protocols just to earn points, to the point that they forget what the underlying assets are actually staked on.
Anyway, I now care more about whether "withdrawing can be done decently" and whether the rules for confiscation are clearly written, rather than the string of numbers on the dashboard.

Next time, I will first draw out the staking path, stopping after stacking one layer at most;
Would you stack multiple layers just for more points?