Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Michael Saylor: The Bitcoin community is dividing into four major factions; any extreme move by any faction will be harmful.
BlockBeats News, June 5th, Strategy founder Michael Saylor wrote that the Bitcoin community is divided into four major ideological factions: Maximalists believe Bitcoin is the only winning monetary network; Capitalists advocate for Bitcoin to be integrated into the global economy, deeply connected with banks, capital markets, and credit tools; Technologists think protocols should continuously improve to address scalability, privacy, and security challenges; Fundamentalists are committed to defending core principles such as Bitcoin’s decentralization, immutability, and self-custody.
Saylor also pointed out the risks associated with each faction. Maximalists may become arrogant and fail to answer how Bitcoin can be integrated with the real economy; Capitalists may lead to excessive leverage and financialization, repeating the systemic vulnerabilities Bitcoin was meant to solve; Technologists might underestimate the value of stability, and protocol changes could, in fact, harm Bitcoin; Fundamentalists who reject all institutional integration and technological improvements may, while safeguarding purity, limit Bitcoin’s reach.
Saylor believes that the underlying protocol should be regarded as sacred infrastructure, and any changes must be made with extreme caution and overwhelming consensus; most innovations should occur at higher layers; individuals always retain the right to self-custody and run nodes. The strength of Bitcoin lies in its ability to serve different groups without belonging to any one of them. It can be personal currency, corporate capital, bank collateral, national reserves, or hope for those facing economic hardship.