Two U.S. Senators push the Department of Labor to revoke the proposed rule to include cryptocurrencies in 401(k) plans

robot
Abstract generation in progress
Mars Finance reports that, according to The Block, U.S. Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, along with Representative Robert Scott, have sent a letter to the Department of Labor requesting the withdrawal of a proposed rule that would allow 401(k) retirement plans to include alternative assets such as cryptocurrencies. In the letter, the lawmakers said the proposed rule would create a so-called safe harbor for trustees who offer alternative investments, which would deprive retirement savers of long-standing investor protections and encourage the use of riskier, more complex, and more expensive investments. The Department of Labor released the proposed rule in March, providing guidance for 401(k) plan administrators on how to add alternative assets—including private equity, real estate, and digital assets—into investment portfolios. The lawmakers expressed concerns about the volatility of digital assets and cited a Federal Bureau of Investigation report stating that in 2025, crypto-related fraud losses reached a record high of more than $11 billion. They also pointed to alleged conflicts of interest involving the Trump family in the crypto space, saying the Department of Labor’s proposed rule could increase the president’s interests at the expense of ordinary workers and retirees.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • 2
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
CandlestickChartsUnderThe
· 06-04 17:47
To put it plainly, it’s still elitism—believing that the working class doesn’t deserve to touch high-risk assets and should only buy the products they specify.
View OriginalReply0
MomentumWalker
· 06-03 07:12
If the rules are revoked, what happens to those who have already made arrangements? Constantly changing policies hurt ordinary investors the most.
View OriginalReply0
TidalShellReflection
· 06-03 02:16
FBI data is indeed frightening, but it’s not right to dismiss encryption entirely; the traditional markets have no fraud either, right?
View OriginalReply0
QuantWinter
· 06-03 02:12
Sanders and his group are just afraid the people will change their circumstances—so what if you add an option to the 401(k)? Don’t adults assess risks for themselves?
View OriginalReply0
0XsundayCook
· 06-03 02:04
Conflicts of interest definitely exist, but why does no one mention the conflicts of interest between the SEC and Wall Street? This double standard.
View OriginalReply0
NonceCollector
· 06-03 02:04
Fraud reaches a record high in 2025, and traditional telephone scams aren’t small either—don’t overreact and ruin something good just because of a little trouble.
View OriginalReply0
OwlAuthorizationMonitor
· 06-03 02:04
Warren’s anti-encryption has become an obsession—every time something goes wrong, she’s the first to jump out. But diversifying pension allocation is the trend of the times.
View OriginalReply0
PaperfoldDao
· 06-03 02:04
The Safe Harbor rules sound like protection, but in reality, they’re welding the door shut—ordinary people don’t even have the option to choose.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pinned