Recently, everyone has been arguing about L2, comparing it to TPS, fees, and subsidies, like different radio stations fighting for signals— the louder the voice, the more it sounds like hypnosis: come here for cheaper and faster. But as soon as it comes to on-chain privacy, suddenly everyone acts like they didn't hear anything... To put it plainly, ordinary people shouldn't expect "complete anonymity," nor should they think "compliance = safety." It's more about which chain you're on, what tools you're using, and who is keeping the books on the other end.



A couple of days ago, I really felt like quitting, even considering uninstalling a few wallet plugins to avoid worrying every day about "will this transaction be flagged." But then I thought, don’t go all-in—what I can do is: leave fewer traces, give fewer permissions, and not click around randomly. If I need to make a large transfer, just do it the proper way. Anyway, my current expectation is: on-chain transparency is the default, privacy is an added filter, and compliance is a boundary, not a talisman. That’s how I’ll proceed for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned