Recently, I saw someone equate "increased stablecoin supply = ETF off-chain funds coming in" directly, basically implying a correlation... but that doesn't mean causation. An increase in stablecoins could be a buffer for arbitrage, market making, or moving assets on-chain, or it could just be an exchange changing its accounting shell; even if there's a net inflow on the ETF side, it doesn't necessarily leave immediate traces on the chain, as there are several layers of channels in between. Don't jump to the conclusion that it's "bullets being loaded."


I'm now more inclined to look at whether they have a time lag or are driven by the same event, otherwise it's easy to fall into self-deception.
By the way, I want to criticize the NFT royalty debate—everyone calls for creators to earn income, but when secondary liquidity tightens, the first to be cut off are also the creators... Sigh, things aren't that linear. Let's stay a bit more cautious.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned