Re-pledging and shared security sound pretty appealing: one asset yields multiple returns, and security can be outsourced to the “stronger.” But I’ve been educated by rug pulls, to be honest, when returns stack up, so do risks—it's just packaged as “systemic.” Now I check the contract first—look at the account: who holds the permissions, whether emergency parameter changes are possible, penalty and confiscation conditions are written in a way that seems harmless but are actually a one-size-fits-all, and I get nervous whenever the project’s wallet moves.

Modularization and the DA layer narrative make developers very excited, but it’s normal for users to be confused… It’s okay if I don’t understand; just don’t mistake “not understanding” for “someone else will cover the risk.” Shared security doesn’t mean shared responsibility; if something goes wrong, you’re probably still the one who bears the consequences. For now, I’d rather earn less than mistake illusions for returns.