These days I've been talking about concurrency and sharding again, and it's quite lively, but in my mind there's only one thing: if something really goes wrong, how do you retreat? Where to put the assets, who holds the permissions, if the bridge breaks, is it directly shut down on the spot... The calmer the surface, the more I dare not be careless. The same goes for staking/sharing security setups; the yield stacking sounds very attractive, but layer after layer, when problems occur, who ultimately bears the responsibility? Honestly, no one dares to take full responsibility.

There's too much information, which also makes me anxious. I now keep it simple and straightforward: first look at the exit path (can it be unilaterally withdrawn, how long to withdraw), then examine abnormal active addresses and large transactions, and finally look at the yields. Even after checking, I still don't feel at ease; I'd rather earn less, just do it this way for now.