most of the time the core team doesn’t think the way we think.

the things we see as “contributing” or “supporting,” they see as low value and mere farming. that’s just the reality of how these teams evaluate community participation especially from africa. (i’m sorry for making seem like it’s a demographic thing but it is)
and the sooner you understand it the better.
it’s also important to understand that CT is bigger than CTng. headboy will always tell me - don’t be a CTng creator only, make sure your content can appeal to the entire crypto twitter community, not just your demographic and he’s right.
a good example -
the brother everyone calls “billions guy” barely got any meaningful allocation, while pranjal walked away with a crazy band. (maybe staked but regardless..)
both participated but completely different outcomes.
(his playbook might have worked for other projects especially big L1s, who knows?)
regardless, the brother got fame and visibility which he can use for other things. still a win.
if your content only makes sense to a nigerian crypto audience, you’ve already capped your ceiling. the teams writing checks are watching CT, not CTng.
thanks for your attention on this matter.