Recently, there have been a bunch of people on the chain shouting "coincidence transfers," looking like a scripted scenario from above, but if you break down the path, it's not that mysterious: first coming out of which cross-chain bridge, landing on which relay address, then swapping at which aggregator, and finally entering the exchange hot wallet... connecting these steps, many "coincidences" are just the same group of people using the same set of operational habits.



I'm actually more afraid of paths that are too clean, as if they’ve been deliberately washed, leaving visible clues for you to see. By the way, I want to complain about that wave of incentives on the testnet—everyone is calculating points, guessing whether the mainnet will issue tokens, and transfers have become especially "purposeful," causing a lot of on-chain noise, making it easier for real risk events to be drowned out... For now, that's it, continuing to watch from the bridge side.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments