SCHD vs NOBL: Which ETF is the Best Buy for Your Dividend Goals?

Both the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD 0.65%) and the **ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF **(NOBL 1.30%) target dividend-focused U.S. equities, but SCHD stands out for its lower cost and higher yield, while NOBL offers a more diversified sector mix.

The ETFs take distinct approaches: SCHD tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, whereas NOBL invests at least 80% of its total assets in component securities of its index, with a minimum of 40 equally weighted stocks and no single sector comprising more than 30% of index weight.

Snapshot (cost & size)

| Metric | SCHD | NOBL | | --- | --- | --- | | Issuer | Schwab | ProShares | | Expense ratio | 0.06% | 0.35% | | 1-yr total return (as of 2026-03-21) | 13.8% | 5.7% | | Dividend yield | 3.5% | 2% | | Beta | 0.65 | 0.76 | | AUM | $98.2 billion | $10.9 billion |

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

SCHD comes in as the more affordable option, charging just 0.06% annually versus NOBL’s 0.35%. SCHD also delivers a higher dividend yield, which may appeal to income-focused investors looking for a stronger payout.

Performance & risk comparison

| Metric | SCHD | NOBL | | --- | --- | --- | | Max drawdown (5 y) | -16.82% | -17.91% | | Growth of $1,000 over 5 years | $1,267 | $1,229 |

What's inside

NOBL holds around 70 stocks, with no single sector allowed to exceed 30% of the portfolio. The fund’s largest sector exposures are industrials (22.5%), consumer defensive (22.09%), and financial services (13.08%). Top holdings as of March 20 include Chevron (CVX +0.12%), **ExxonMobil **(XOM +0.95%), and **Linde **(LIN 0.37%), each making up less than 2% of assets. The fund has a 12.4-year track record. This equally weighted approach aims to reduce concentration risk and maintain broad exposure to established dividend growers.

In contrast, SCHD holds 101 names, leaning more heavily on energy (19.88%), consumer defensive (18.5%), and healthcare (16.2%). Its largest positions are **ConocoPhillips **(COP +0.71%), Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT 1.58%), and Chevron, each at around 4.8%–5% of assets, creating a more top-heavy profile. Both funds avoid leverage, currency hedging, and other structural quirks.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investors

The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF offers a much higher dividend yield than the ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF. That’s because SCHD is yield-oriented, investing in stocks offering high yields. However, the fund’s underlying index, the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100™ Index, ensures that its companies have a strong dividend track record and selects its constituents using financial ratios. That means only high-quality companies make it to the ETF.

NOBL data by YCharts

NOBL, on the other hand, focuses on dividend growth instead of yields, investing only in Dividend Aristocrats®. The term Dividend Aristocrats_®_ is a registered trademark of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC, a subsidiary of the S&P 500 Global (SPGI 0.40%). It is an elite group of S&P 500 companies that have raised their dividends for at least 25 consecutive years. These are established companies in their respective industries with strong financials that can support regular, growing dividends.

The combination of a higher yield with significantly lower fees (expense ratio) makes SCHD a superior dividend ETF to own. NOBL, however, is a better fit for investors seeking dividend stability, as its constituents have a long track record of dividend raises.

CVX-0.72%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments