I have a point to raise: regarding the changes in Genius points, some say everyone has decreased and it's no big deal. But this logic actually doesn't hold up.

The project team clearly aims to attract new users and generate buzz through activities. The initial plan was quite aggressive—register and get 500 GP instantly, with additional rewards for invitations. This approach seems tempting, but where's the problem? Once the event ends, these users who took advantage of the free offers basically leave. User stickiness hasn't been established, and the devaluation of points becomes inevitable. So it looks like "everyone has decreased," but fundamentally, the project's incentive logic was flawed from the start—there's a contradiction between short-term user acquisition and long-term retention, and in the end, they just use inflation to fill this gap.