The constant changes in the project are exhausting. Early statements, recent adjustments to the points system—after a series of operations, it only proves one thing—the project's team indeed has limited vision and doesn't really care about the community.

Today, they think they gave too many points and can reset your points at any moment; tomorrow, they find the airdrop quota exceeds expectations and can directly revoke your eligibility for the airdrop. Such capricious practices cause significant damage to participants' trust, and perhaps the project team has never considered this.

Instead of waiting for the next rule change, it's better to focus your energy on more stable and transparent exchange platforms. Choosing projects supported by reputable institutions and with more standardized governance is a wiser long-term decision. At least, it allows you to sleep peacefully.