The $FLOW project has recently encountered difficulties. According to informed sources, negotiations between a leading exchange and the FLOW team have reached a stalemate. The exchange believes that the FLOW team has issues such as "low communication efficiency" and "passing the buck"; meanwhile, the FLOW team points out that the exchange's anti-money laundering compliance processes are imperfect. The two sides are far apart in their positions, and there has been no effective dialogue for over a week. The future of the collaboration looks bleak. The market is generally concerned about whether there can be a turning point, but given the current deadlock, the likelihood of both sides reaching an agreement in the short term is low.

FLOW-2.59%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
SoliditySurvivor
· 01-22 00:14
Blaming others again, same old trick
View OriginalReply0
LightningClicker
· 01-21 09:03
Another project has failed again, FLOW is truly done this time.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersFOMO
· 01-20 20:22
Once again, I hear that a project has failed. FLOW really can't hold up anymore.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerGas
· 01-19 02:01
A typical principal-agent problem. The breakdown of negotiations essentially results from an information asymmetry leading to an imbalance of power. Exchanges need to comply with FLOW to list tokens, and no one wants to be the first to back down... If this continues, the arbitrage opportunities will be completely eroded.
View OriginalReply0
LootboxPhobia
· 01-19 02:01
Being genuine is enough, but it's the same old story of "low communication efficiency" and "passing the buck," a common cliché, buddy.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSurvivor
· 01-19 02:01
It's another round of passing the buck; this time, FLOW probably can't handle it.
View OriginalReply0
Web3ExplorerLin
· 01-19 01:50
honestly, sounds like classic oracle problem but irl — neither side willing to bridge the gap, both finger-pointing at different consensus layers. FLOW's comms fumble + exchange's compliance black box = deadlock. ngl, this is giving "two blockchains trying to interoperate without a proper relay" vibes. who breaks first usually matters more than who's actually right here.
Reply0
AirdropHunter007
· 01-19 01:37
Another blame-shifting drama, neither of them should deny it.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin