Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 30+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
A transparency controversy has erupted within the Neo ecosystem. Project co-founder Erik Zhang recently publicly accused founder Da Hongfei of violating commitments to disclose financial information, calling on him to release a complete financial report to the community to dispel market doubts. However, Da Hongfei quickly countered, alleging that Erik has access to key fund flows and may influence critical voting mechanisms, implying that the other's "transparency doubts" involve a conflict of interest. Both sides stand firm, with the focus of the dispute on governance power distribution and information disclosure systems. This public confrontation among Neo executives once again exposes the difficulty large blockchain projects face in balancing decentralized governance and financial oversight, also prompting the community to reflect deeply on improving project governance systems.
Here we go again, the transparency issue of big projects can never be resolved, right?
No, whoever controls the flow of funds has the say. This logic is so heartbreaking.
Neo's governance system is truly a mess; decentralization is just a joke.
I just want to know when the community can truly supervise these people?