Seeing that 8-point rating, to be honest, it seems a bit underestimated. One must understand the professionalism and activity level of this group, and such a rating does not seem to truly reflect the actual heat of the community. The rating mechanism on Twitter can sometimes lag behind, especially for communities with high participation and deep discussions. From the dimensions of community heat, discussion quality, and number of participants, we should be able to produce more impressive numbers. This also reminds us that when looking at platform ratings, we must judge them in conjunction with the actual activity level of the community, and not be constrained by a single metric.