After $PONS surged to 0.6571, I instead took 70% off first. It’s not that I’m bearish, but this level is right at the key prior-high resistance, making it less cost-effective to keep chasing. The move up from 0.6155 formed a breakout-pullback-breakout structure, with each pullback holding at a higher key level and volume expanding on the breakouts.

The key levels are clear now: the prior high is the first key level. If, after breaking out, price can pull back on declining volume and hold the upper boundary, that would be the new entry setup; if it only surges above it and then falls back, it

$SKYAI I bet this move will retrace to 0.038. Posting this as proof—if you disagree, take a screenshot and come back tomorrow to prove me wrong.
Current price: 0.0510, down 16% in 24 hours, with a high of 0.0630 and a low of 0.0496, and 15.4M in trading volume. Given this volume relative to the size of the drop, this isn’t panic selling that has run its course—someone is still exiting. Looking at the on-chain data, two of the top 50 addresses have been continuously selling in the 0.058-0.062 range, with every rebound being pushed back down. I’ve seen this structure too many times: a typical di

$AVAX Short-term bias is bullish, but upside is limited by the market’s neutral sentiment, so chasing highs is not advisable.
The Fear & Greed Index is 50, placing the market in the neutral range, with neither panic selling pressure nor overheated chasing momentum. With BTC yet to provide a clear direction, capital is more inclined to rotate among small- and mid-cap sectors. AVAX is up 1.97% over 24h, with a trading volume of 19.0M USDT, representing a mild follow-through rather than leadership. This indicates that it is a catch-up asset driven by the broader market, rather than an independent

After $ONDO surged to 0.371, I instead took profit on 70% first. It’s not that I’m bearish; this level is right around the key previous-high resistance, so the cost-effectiveness of chasing further has decreased. The move up from 0.3497 formed a breakout-retest-breakout structure, with each pullback holding at a higher key level and volume expanding on the breakouts.

The key levels are clear now: the previous high is the first key level. If, after the breakout, price can pull back on declining volume and hold the upper boundary, that would be the new entry logic; if it only pushes above and

JUST IN: US equities rally post-rate hike with chips leading; crypto treasury stocks jump while BTC stays rangebound. $BNB , $PURR, $BMNR, $MSTR pushing higher alongside broader crypto-related names.

$AB
It held the support band. If it breaks things could deteriorate

📈 Bitcoin Road to $90,000 May Include One More Major Higher Low
Bitcoin’s Current Range Mirrors a Key 2023 Structure as $70K–$90K Levels Come Into Focus.
Bitcoin’s long-term chart shows a recurring sequence of rally, consolidation, downside liquidity sweep, and renewed expansion. The current structure is developing between roughly $60,000 and $84,000, following the decline from the chart’s major high near $124,000–$126,000.
The chart also highlights a 2023 structure as a historical comparison. The price levels and sequence are similar in form, although the present structure is occurring at su

After $NEAR surged to 3.1274, I instead took 70% off first. It’s not that I’m bearish; this level is right at the key prior-high resistance, making chasing less attractive. The move up from 2.4131 formed a breakout-pullback-breakout structure, with each pullback holding at a higher key level and volume expanding on the breakouts.
The key levels are clear now: the prior high is the first key level. If, after breaking out, the price pulls back on lower volume and holds the upper boundary, that would be the new entry logic; if it only pushes up and then falls back, it could be a false breakout. I

Most retail traders habitually chase rises and sell into declines, blindly following the crowd, yet find it difficult to calm down and refine a trading system of their own.
Watching position after position get trapped, liquidated to zero, or painfully cut, they see too much of the market’s joys and sorrows.
When trading, you must not lose your rhythm or disrupt the established order.
Every trader who makes it through has endured hardships that others find difficult to empathize with.
From holding losing positions and getting liquidated to seeing their funds reduced to zero, they struggle throu

After $ARB surged to 0.17653, I instead took 70% off the table first. It’s not that I’m bearish, but this level is right at the key prior-high resistance, making it less cost-effective to keep chasing. The move up from 0.13354 formed a breakout-pullback-breakout structure, with each pullback holding at a higher key level and volume expanding on the breakouts.

The key levels are clear now: the prior high is the first key level. After the breakout, only a low-volume pullback that holds the upper boundary would establish a new entry setup; if it merely pushes above and then falls back, it could

I had already finished complaining to my friends about this week’s market, but now I have to take it all back. A bit awkward.

A few days ago in the afternoon, the $BR long position held on the retest and buying pressure strengthened, so I signaled opening a long around 0.21096. Now at 0.66389, +4232.39% secured. It took off—those who were on board should have laughed themselves awake.

Take profit on 80% first, and protect the remaining 20% at the entry price. Don’t get greedy for the last bite; put the bulk in your pocket first.

Panic comes from having no plan, and losses come from over

$BR English long trade 10x | Demand zone activated, execution beats speculation.
BR has reached the key area where buyers need to add. This long setup has a clear invalidation point, which further strengthens my confidence. Trading plan: - Entry: 0.66133 – 0.66771- TP1: 0.68751 (R:R 1:0.7)- TP2: 0.70284 (R:R 1:1.3)- TP3: 0.72583 (R:R 1:2.0)- Stop loss: 0.63387
Why this structure? - The 4-hour bullish narrative remains unchanged; meanwhile, the 1-day analysis supports further upside from 0.66452, around 0.66133–0.66771. - The 15-minute RSI is 48; this neutral momentum means further upside rema

#ArcEcosystemAndMemeCoinsPlunge
The newly launched Arc ecosystem is seeing a sharp pullback across several popular platform and meme tokens. According to market data reported on September 17, ARGUS fell more than 40%, LONG dropped over 70%, TOLLY declined more than 56%, while meme coins COOL and ARCAT fell over 75% and 64% respectively over 12 hours.
This follows the strong speculative activity surrounding Arc’s mainnet launch. Earlier, tokens such as LONG, TOLLY, ARGUS and COOL had already experienced major retracements after reaching early peaks.
The move highlights the risks of trading new

$ZEC It surged 13 points in one day. Would you dare chase it at 1472? I’ve already locked my stop-loss at 1300.
First, let’s look at the chart. ZEC went straight from the low of 1301 to 1516, with 4.35 billion in 24-hour trading volume. That’s not volume retail investors can generate. At 1472, there’s only $44 of room to the daily high. 1516 is the first resistance level today, followed by the 1550-1580 range, a previous high-volume trading zone. Technically, this is a bullish breakout candle backed by heavy volume, but the problem is that it has already moved too far away from the 5-day movin

Comparing the upside potential of the three veteran POW coins $BCH $LTC
$ETC
in this bull market: BCH has a $4.7 billion market cap, LTC $4.1 billion, and ETC $1.1 billion. BCH is a fork of Bitcoin, LTC is modeled after BTC, and ETC is Ethereum’s native chain. BCH is currently Grayscale’s third-largest holding, but BCH’s shell has been sold to Middle Eastern capital and is no longer operated by Bitmain, which is also why BCH performed so strongly in the previous bull market. LTC is currently Grayscale’s second-largest holding and also has the support of a spot ETF. Although there is basicall

I had already finished complaining to my friends about this week’s market action, but now I have to take it all back—it’s a little awkward.
A few days ago, before bed, I saw $SCRT make another push. Every surge fell just short, with insufficient buying support, so I casually noted that there was no need to rush into SCRT shorts and to wait and see around 0.02694.
I woke up to 0.00772, a direct +1746.74% move. Those who were on board probably woke up laughing. Getting the timing right feels much better than keeping busy for nothing.
Take 80% off the table first, and move the remaining 20% to t

I had already finished complaining to my friends about this week's market action, but now I have to take it back—kind of awkward.
A few days ago in the afternoon, $LAB was struggling to rebound. Every push upward fell just short, and volume failed to follow. I only gave one reminder at the time: no one is taking it higher, so shorts can be considered.
Entered at 0.08529, reached 0.05107, +789.76% secured. Those on board should have woken up laughing.
Close 80% first, and protect the remaining 20% at the entry price. Don't get greedy for the last bite—put the bulk in your pocket first.
The mar

【$AVA Signal】Go long on a negative funding rate short squeeze, pullback to the 1H midline
$AVA Pullback to the 1H midline; the 4H MACD red histogram at 0.0135 is contracting, while the 1H histogram at -0.0050 has turned negative. Current price: 0.2672.
🎯Direction: Long
⚡Entry/Limit Order: 0.266498 - 0.267300
🛑Stop-loss: 0.264627
🚀Target 1: 0.271309
🚀Target 2: 0.273314
🛡️Trade Management:
- Execution strategy: Take 50% off at Target 1 and move the stop-loss up to breakeven. If the price falls back to the entry level, exit automatically to protect the principal.
Depth logic: 14-period RSI i