Gate Wiki

This comprehensive guide compares LAVA and ADA, two distinct blockchain platforms serving different market segments. LAVA Network, launched in 2024, coordinates traffic for AI agents and applications across blockchains, while Cardano (ADA), established in 2017, operates as a mature financial infrastructure platform. The article analyzes historical price trends, current market status on Gate, supply mechanisms, and institutional adoption patterns to evaluate investment potential. Price predictions through 2031 suggest both assets offer growth opportunities, with ADA providing stability and LAVA presenting higher volatility. Investment strategies vary by risk tolerance: conservative investors favor 70-80% ADA allocation, while aggressive investors explore 50-60% LAVA positioning. Key considerations include trading volume differences ($3.2M ADA vs $366K LAVA on Gate), technical risks, regulatory factors, and ecosystem development trajectories to determine which asset aligns with individual investment objectives.

This comprehensive analysis compares BANANAS31, a community-driven meme token launched in 2024 on BNB blockchain, with APT, a Layer 1 blockchain infrastructure project utilizing Move programming language. The article examines historical price trends, current market status as of January 2026, and investment value across multiple dimensions. BANANAS31 shows extreme volatility ranging from $0.076 to $0.0006898, while APT demonstrates established market presence with superior liquidity. The guide analyzes tokenomics, institutional adoption, technical ecosystems, and macroeconomic factors affecting both assets. Price forecasts through 2031 project BANANAS31 reaching $0.0047-$0.0089 and APT reaching $1.33-$2.60 under baseline scenarios. Investment strategies differ significantly: BANANAS31 suits speculative traders seeking high-volatility opportunities, while APT appeals to infrastructure-focused investors with longer horizons. Risk assessment covers market volatility, technical dependencies, and regulatory uncerta

This comprehensive analysis compares IQ and SAND, two distinct cryptocurrency assets within blockchain infrastructure and metaverse gaming sectors. IQ, launched in 2018, positions itself as an AI-powered knowledge ecosystem through platforms like IQ.wiki and IQGPT.com. SAND, established in 2020, enables virtual experience creation and monetization within gaming environments. As of January 2026, SAND trades at $0.1397 with superior liquidity ($522,474.13 daily volume) and stronger momentum (+21.18% 7-day performance), while IQ at $0.001612 demonstrates higher volatility but potential long-term growth. The article examines historical price trends, tokenomics, ecosystem applications, and risk factors to guide investment decisions across conservative to aggressive profiles, with projected price ranges through 2031 provided for both assets.

This comprehensive analysis compares TBK and XRP investment potential in 2024-2031, examining two distinctly positioned cryptocurrency assets. TBK, launched in 2025 as an energy-leasing and staking platform within the TRON ecosystem, currently trades at $0.40285, while XRP, established since 2011 for cross-border payments, trades at $1.965. The article evaluates historical price trends, tokenomics, technical ecosystems, and institutional adoption patterns. XRP demonstrates superior liquidity ($86.02M vs $119.5K daily volume) and longer market history, while TBK offers emerging utility within TRON infrastructure. Long-term forecasts through 2031 project XRP reaching $3.38-$5.69 versus TBK's $0.67-$1.01. Investment strategies differentiate by risk tolerance: conservative investors favor XRP (70-80% allocation), while aggressive investors consider balanced exposure. Both assets face distinct risks—TBK experiences higher volatility and liquidity constraints, while XRP faces regulatory and market sentiment challen

This comprehensive investment comparison article analyzes BABY versus KAVA cryptocurrency tokens, examining their distinct market positioning, price performance, and investment potential through 2031. BABY, launched in 2025, offers innovative native Bitcoin staking mechanisms on the Bitcoin blockchain without intermediaries, while KAVA, operational since 2019, functions as an established cross-chain DeFi Layer 1 hub supporting collateralized lending and stablecoin services. The article addresses investor concerns through historical price trend analysis, current market status on Gate exchange, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption factors, and detailed price predictions spanning 2026-2031. Investors will discover tailored strategies for conservative and aggressive portfolios, comprehensive risk assessments including market volatility and regulatory exposure, and practical allocation recommendations. Whether seeking Bitcoin ecosystem exposure or established DeFi infrastructure exposure, this guide provides

In macro markets, “liquidity” is the invisible fuel that powers everything from tech rallies to crypto breakouts. That is why Bank of America’s latest research has become one of the most shared narratives in both TradFi and crypto circles. According to a research note led by strategist Michael Hartnett, the market liquidity outlook for 2026 could receive roughly $0.6 trillion, around $600 billion, in supportive flow from a mix of Treasury dynamics, mortgage-backed securities activity, and reinvestment mechanics. Some traders immediately labeled it “QE returning,” expecting Bitcoin and equities to rally the way they did in previous liquidity-heavy periods. Others, including experienced analysts, pushed back. They argue that this is liquidity support, not an official Federal Reserve balance sheet expansion, and the market should avoid oversimplifying it into a one-line bullish slogan. Still, the buzz matters, because narratives influence positioning. Bitcoin hovering near $95,000 in this context makes the liq

Learn about Richard Heart, the founder of HEX and PulseChain, and his historic legal win against the SEC. Examine how this case sets a precedent affecting cryptocurrency regulation and decentralized blockchain, brought to you by Gate.

Markets flipped into full risk-off mode after President Trump escalated trade tension with a headline that felt more geopolitical than economic. Trump announced 10% tariffs on imports from eight NATO allies, including Denmark, Norway, and Germany, starting February 1, with the tariff rate set to rise to 25% by June 1 unless those countries agree to sell Greenland to the United States. The immediate response was classic macro rotation. Investors rushed into safe havens, pushing gold price record and silver price record moves to fresh highs. Meanwhile Bitcoin, often marketed as “digital gold,” reacted very differently. BTC dropped nearly $4,000 in about an hour, wiping out more than $525 million in bullish bets, a rapid liquidation cascade that reminded traders how fast crypto can deleverage during political shocks. This divergence, metals soaring while Bitcoin sells off, is not a contradiction. It is a reflection of how liquidity, leverage, and risk perception function in different asset classes. For macro i

The Federal Reserve is back in the headlines, not because of an emergency rate cut or a major economic shock, but because of a scheduled liquidity operation that crypto traders are treating like a macro catalyst. The Fed’s Open Market Trading Desk has outlined a series of Treasury bill purchases starting January 20, with maximum purchases totaling roughly $55.36 billion through early February. On social media, some high-profile crypto commentators have framed the move as a major boost for risk assets, including Bitcoin and large-cap altcoins. The logic is familiar. More liquidity in the system often supports higher prices for stocks and crypto. However, macro professionals are more cautious, noting that these operations are closer to routine reserve management than full-scale stimulus, and they do not automatically mean a return to 2020-style quantitative easing. Still, the market reaction matters. Whether the Fed intends it or not, liquidity headlines can change positioning quickly. For traders and investo

Master the art of spotting and trading the hammer candlestick pattern in crypto markets. This in-depth guide explores technical analysis, bullish strategies, hammer pattern variations, and proven methods for confirming buy signals on Gate—helping you maximize trading profits in Bitcoin and altcoins.

This comprehensive guide helps cryptocurrency traders master technical indicators to optimize trading success. The article explores eight essential indicators including MACD, RSI, Aroon, Fibonacci Retracement, OBV, Ichimoku Cloud, Stochastic Oscillator, and Bollinger Bands. It explains how MACD identifies trend changes through moving average crossovers, generating buy and sell signals. Each indicator's advantages and limitations are analyzed to help traders understand when to apply them effectively. The guide emphasizes combining multiple indicators to reduce false signals and improve decision accuracy. Practical FAQ sections address common questions about using these tools on Gate trading platform. Perfect for traders seeking data-driven strategies that adapt to volatile cryptocurrency market conditions while minimizing emotional trading decisions.

This comprehensive guide compares withdrawal and trading fees across leading crypto platforms, helping traders minimize costs and maximize returns. The article breaks down three primary fee types: trading fees (maker/taker model), deposit fees, and withdrawal fees for both fiat and cryptocurrencies. A detailed comparison table reveals that fee differences—ranging from 0.10% to 0.60%—can amount to hundreds or thousands of dollars annually depending on trading volume. The guide demonstrates practical strategies to reduce fees including using limit orders, increasing trading volume to unlock tiered discounts, leveraging exchange tokens, and monitoring promotional offers. Whether you're a new investor or experienced trader, selecting a low-fee exchange is fundamental to portfolio growth and long-term profitability on platforms like Gate.

本文深入解析上升楔形形態，是技術分析中識別趨勢逆轉的重要工具。文章系統介紹上升楔形的三大特點（形態形成、趨勢線、成交量），詳細闡述看漲與看跌逆轉兩大類型。透過時間範圍選擇、支撐阻力位識別和確認訊號等方法精準辨識形態，並提供突破策略和回調策略兩種交易方案。重點強調設置合理的停損和利潤目標、部位規模管理、風險報酬率評估等風險管理實踐。對比其他圖表形態，提示常見交易錯誤，分享成功交易技巧。無論在股票、外匯、大宗商品或加密貨幣市場，掌握此形態都能顯著提升交易決策品質和長期獲利能力。

Bitcoin’s rally hit a sudden air pocket after President Trump’s new tariff threat reignited global trade war anxiety. Following the announcement of a 10% tariff on imports from eight European countries, with the rate potentially rising to 25% by June, markets flipped into risk-off mode. Bitcoin dropped from around $96,000 to roughly $92,715, triggering a fast liquidation cascade and briefly pushing BTC below the psychologically important $93,000 zone. The move was not isolated. Total crypto liquidations reportedly reached $850 million in 24 hours, while around $525 million was wiped out in just 60 minutes, a sign that leveraged positioning was too aggressive for the macro headline risk. At the same time, gold surged to a fresh record above $4,650 per ounce, showing capital rotation into classic safe havens. This is a key moment for investors, because the sell-off was not about crypto fundamentals breaking. It was about how global macro shocks hit crypto liquidity faster than most traders expect.

Explore top cryptocurrency trading simulators designed for education and hands-on practice. Access free virtual trading platforms on Gate, TradingView, and other sites, featuring real-time market data. Trade cryptocurrencies online risk-free—no capital at stake. Perfect for both newcomers and seasoned web3 traders.