Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Event Contracts
New
Predict price moves and seize opportunities
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
Stock CFD derivatives
Stocks
Invest directly in popular stocks and ETFs worldwide
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Stock Options
New
Popular stock options, flexible leverage
Stocks Activities
Trade popular stocks and unlock generous airdrops
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Anthropic
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
Others
Help Center
Find FAQs and help guides
Partners
Grow with the champions
Proof of Reserves
Gate promises 100% proof of reserves
Proof of Security (PoSEC)
Full cold storage for user funds
Gate Guard
Account Protection Plan
Gate Vault
Keep your assets secure
Licenses
Regulatory licenses, registrations, and approvals
“Wu Qing (Chairman of the CSRC) Hasn’t Announced New Policies, but One Sentence Has Rewritten the Pricing Rules for Tech Stocks”
Yesterday, November 14, at the inaugural China Capital Markets Academic Annual Conference, Wu Qing didn’t discuss short-term trends or signal any specific policy tailwinds.
But one sentence—“scientifically calibrate the pace, and strengthen research into institutional adaptability and risk response mechanisms for the issuance and listing of large and emerging tech companies”—made the message clear: it addressed recent controversy over valuation premium bubbles in some tech companies’ IPOs.
The key lies in the words “pace.”
The direction of supporting tech company listings hasn’t changed, but financing scale, pricing constraints, and institutional buffers are now on the table early.
The real question isn’t whether companies can go public, but whether the A-share market can recognize the value of technology and bear the risks of innovation.
Army’s take:
The regulatory focus has shifted from the financing side to the pricing side—from “opening the doors wide” to “scientifically calibrating the pace.”
Going forward, the companies that can command a premium will be hard-tech firms with clear technology roadmaps and commercialization timelines—not companies that slap on a label to ride a trend!