Post
Bearish

Countdown to Jensen Huang stepping down! $NVDA Whales rake in $12 million—is the big money liquidating longs or turning around to wipe out shorts?



When bearish news is common knowledge, the blade often swings the other way.

My take: The big money is playing a double whammy: “liquidate longs first, then squeeze shorts.” On the 1-hour chart, NVDA is near 163 with a MACD death cross, but the RSI is already oversold. Seven-day net outflows of $351 million make the panic obvious.

On the liquidation map, 224 whale shorts are sitting on more than $12 million in unrealized profits, while the nominal long/short ratio is just 7.73%—shorts are extremely crowded. The meeting on whether Jensen Huang will stay or leave is underway, and the market is pricing in an 86% chance he steps down. Before the bearish news lands, the big money is most likely to first push the price down in a quick wick to sweep long stops near 163, then turn around and squeeze shorts on news of an interim CEO appointment.

Entry rationale: Don’t chase shorts. Aggressive traders can take a small long position near 158–160; conservative traders can wait for a rebound to a higher level before shorting!

Will Jensen Huang step down or not? Once the board’s decision comes out tonight, will this wick be gold or a knife? @老张说趋势 Stay tuned
#Gate直通IPO第三期Anthropic #Gate全球合规版图扩展
View Original
This page contains third-party content and does not constitute any advice, nor does it represent Gate's endorsement of such views. For details, please see disclaimer.
NVDANVDA-0.35%

  • 1

Add a comment
Add a comment

Comment 7
AliceTrading
224 whales are sitting on $12 million in unrealized gains, averaging just $50k each. This position sizing makes me anxious.
DeFiForager
This short squeeze play… could it work? I haven’t dared to pull the trigger yet. I wonder what you think the odds are.
Point618
163? The Fibonacci level is at 161.8, and the way you’ve set your stop-loss has me tempted to make a move.
DegenArchaeologist
Back when NVDA was only $30, the term “whale” hadn’t even been coined. And now $12 million is considered a massive profit?
CommunityFixer
Everyone bet on an 86% chance, and the result ended up being either 100 or 0. This voting design really knows how to create suspense.
TwoFAFanatic
Is the 86% probability from Polymarket or your internal research? Is the data source linked to 2FA? I’m skeptical of this figure.
GasFeeAssassin
They wick the market when gas is low—the whales have even better timing than I do.