Post

I’m bearish on this move by the so-called “Coalition of the Willing.” They went to Abu Dhabi to scuttle peace talks, saying Russia has already lost, when in reality they want to drag out the conflict and grind things out. It’s the same flaw you see in trading: no matter how right your directional call is, if you lose control of your position size, you’ll still get blown up. After doing this for so long, I’ve come to believe that position sizing always matters more than calling the direction right. In this geopolitical game of attrition, it’s hard to say who’ll be the first to crack. So what’s the conclusion? I haven’t figured it out yet either.

View Original
post-image
This page contains third-party content and does not constitute any advice, nor does it represent Gate's endorsement of such views. For details, please see disclaimer.


Add a comment
Add a comment

Comment 6
The hot air balloon rises above the pullback.
A 50% drawdown is called a long cycle; a 90% drawdown is called faith
InflationAntidote
Fiat currency depreciation is a slow-moving variable; geopolitical conflict is a fast-moving one. Fast variables wipe out leverage, and only after the leverage is gone does the slow variable get priced in. Many people get the order backwards
OptionStrategist
The directional call is right, but naked put selling doesn’t work
GoldBit
Gold doesn’t need to guess what the other side is thinking, and neither does BTC. Politicians do, though—how exhausting
DivSeeder
Staking rewards haven’t been withdrawn yet; still monitoring
GasExhaust
Keep it going? Let’s first calculate the annualized Gas rate