Post

$1.15 per hour, pushed higher for eleven straight hours.


Pushed higher.
From 127.48 to 140.10.
An average of 0.9 points.
08:00 to 11:00 was the strongest stretch, gaining 4.89 in three hours.
1.63 per hour, 40% faster than the full stretch.
Then it stopped.
After touching 140.10 at 12:00, it didn't touch that level again; volume fell to 50%, then 38%.
Same stretch of road: it ran at first, then inched along.
The chart closed at 138.75, now at 138.99, with MA20 still only at 132.81.
Seoul 15:30 converts to Beijing 14:30; this leg is already over.
$SKHY
(Not investment advice; you are responsible for your own gains and losses)
View Original
post-image
This page contains third-party content and does not constitute any advice, nor does it represent Gate's endorsement of such views. For details, please see disclaimer.
SKHYSKHY+0.86%

  • 2

Add a comment
Add a comment

Comment 8
DigitalPiggyBank
From 138.75 to 138.99, the gap is so small I can't even be bothered to open my wallet and look while DCAing
ScreenshotGuy
Screenshot saved, pretending I’m all-in at 127.48
RiskScale
Volume fell from 50% to 38%. This isn’t low-volume consolidation; it’s a liquidity vacuum. Slippage on the same token pair on Curve has already jumped two tiers
OptionSeeker
Is the implied volatility surface distorted at this price level?
FlashLoanExp
Three hours, 4.89; enough gas for me to arbitrage ten times
ThresholdHunter
0.9 points per hour sounds steady, but the 08:00–11:00 stretch drained the momentum from the following six hours, effectively concentrating the whole day’s volatility into the first three hours. The remaining eight hours were just low-volume sideways trading. My threshold is set at 1.2, so it wasn’t triggered and I didn’t act
Cross-section of succulent structure
Do “running” and “moving” have the same fee structure?
CommunityTxer
During those few hours afterward, does the author think it was building momentum or that there really were no buyers