LAB at $16, do you want to run for your life?
Two days ago it was lying in the $6 'morgue', today a big green candle shot to $17.5, surging 118%. Some shout 'the king returns', others curse 'whales dumping'. With massive unlocks looming in July-August, is this a real reversal or a 'corpse bounce' after the crash?
First thing: why did it crash? Not because the project is bad, but because it's 'too profitable'
In early July, LAB plunged from 20+ to 6-7.5, dropping over 60% in a single week. What happened?
313 early participants, paper gains were terrifyingly large
Large wallets started transferring tokens to exchanges
On-chain sleuths like ZachXBT revealed: 'Insiders control over 95% of the supply'
Leveraged longs were liquidated in cascade, a stampede to sell
A group of people got too many tokens at low cost, wanted to exit, and crashed the market.
Second thing: why the surge today? Not a reversal, but 'dog-eat-dog'
This big green candle today, three reasons:
First, shorts got squeezed. The earlier drop was too severe, many opened shorts, negative funding + short squeeze, shorts forced to buy back, pushing price up.
Second, low circulating supply amplifies effects. Only 310 million tokens in circulation, 31% of total supply, a small amount of capital can pump dozens of percentage points.
Third, FOMO sentiment returns. The overall market stabilizes, BTC bounced from 58k to 63k, risk appetite rises, high-beta altcoins catch hot money's attention.
Simply put, this is a feast of 'short-squeeze cannibalism', not a value return.
Third thing: the biggest bomb is still ahead
In July-August, a large amount of linear unlocks will be released.
Some estimates put the monthly unlock value at over $300 million. The tokens held by early players, VCs, and team have a cost lower than you can imagine.
In the face of unlocks, all technical analysis is a paper tiger.
If the project team can negotiate a delay in unlocks, there might still be hope. But if they silently let the tokens flow into the market, $16 might just be the halfway point.
The battle of bulls and bears, you decide
On one side (bullish reasons):
Today's surge of 70%+, volume increase, short-term bulls in control
AI trading terminal + multi-chain aggregation, product logic still intact
BTC stabilizing, macro environment warm, risk assets benefiting
Low circulating supply, low cost to pump
On the other side (bearish reasons):
Massive unlocks in July-August, over $300 million selling pressure
Controversy over insiders controlling 95% of supply not resolved
The crash from 27 to 6 has hurt too many people
High FDV (~$16 billion) severely disconnected from actual adoption
Key levels
Resistance above: 17.5-18 → 20.2 (previous key resistance level)
Support below: 14.9 → 9.3-10 → 5.7-6 (solid bottom)
Ultra-short-term aggressive traders:
At current price around 16, go long with light position, target 17.5-18.5, stop loss 14.8.
If it breaks above 17.5 with volume, chase, target 20, stop loss 16.
Swing traders seeking stability:
Wait for a pullback to 14-15 before entering, or wait until the July-August unlocks happen and confirm no massive selling pressure.
Position rules:
LAB should only be a 'satellite position', no more than 5% of total portfolio
Leverage no more than 3x, this thing can drop 30% in a day
Set stop loss, don't hold losing positions
LAB is up 70% today, not because it is worth 70% more.
Just because it fell too hard, too many shorts, got counter-killed.
It could be the next 100x myth, or the next zero case.
In this game, every penny you make has someone on the other side laughing.
LAB at $16, dare you get on board?
When it falls back to $6, you'll regret not running today.
When it hits $30, you'll regret not buying today.
View Original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third-party sources and is for reference only. It does not represent the views or opinions of Gate and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Virtual asset trading involves high risk. Please do not rely solely on the information on this page when making decisions. For details, see the
Disclaimer.