MultiversX to Hold Community Meeting on November 3, 2025

$BEAT BEAT Surges 30%: A Correction Within a Rally? BEAT has delivered a significant bounce, rising roughly 30% in the past 24 hours to trade around $2.70, recovering from a low of $2.07 . The move comes after the token broke down from a sustained 20-25% range in July, and the current price action appears to be a relief rally within a larger corrective structure. The broader trajectory remains uncertain, as the token is down roughly 30% over the past week and needs to reclaim the $2.84 level to signal a true reversal . The Technical Picture The RSI is approaching 65, entering overbought territory, which, combined with the rejection at the $2.84 resistance, suggests that caution is warranted for new entries . The 4-hour chart shows lower highs and lower lows, and the EMA cloud is stacked bearishly: EMA7 at $2.99 sits below EMA25 at $3.43, which is below EMA99 at $5.50 . The MACD is showing a bullish divergence on the daily chart, with price making lower lows while the MACD makes higher lows, suggesting that downside momentum may be exhausted . However, the divergence needs to be confirmed by a break above the $2.84 resistance . The token also formed a lower high at $2.84 on August 7, which is a bearish pattern that suggests sellers are still in control until a new higher high is established. What's Driving the Move: AI Hype Meets Correction BEAT, trading under the ticker "Beat," is positioned as an "AI virtual world tour" project, tapping into the growing interest in AI and music . The token is part of the "AI narrative" that has driven speculative interest in several projects . However, it's worth noting that the token's founder, Elvis, is a well-known "crypto veteran" on the Chinese internet, which may support the ongoing narrative despite the current price correction . The project's maximum supply is 1.5 billion, with 1.3 billion currently in circulation, and the token has seen a 1.27% increase in trading volume over the past week . Key Levels to Watch The immediate resistance is the $2.84 level, which has rejected the price twice this week . A break above this level would be the first sign of a trend reversal, targeting $3.00 and $3.10 . Support is layered at $2.07, and a breakdown below this level would open the door to $1.80 and potentially $1.50 . The $1.70-$1.80 area is also a major historical support level from the previous consolidation range . Until the price can break above the descending resistance line and establish a higher high, the trend remains downward. The current bounce is likely to be met with resistance at $2.84, and only a close above this level would signal the beginning of a trend reversal . #WeekendMarketAnalysis This is absolutely not investment advice. Always do your own research.

$TUT (Tutorial) – Massive Parabolic Run, Taking Partial Profits I'm watching TUT closely because it's exploded +102.76% to $0.077380, surging from a low of $0.035822 in just 24 hours. The moving averages are in full-scale bullish expansion with EMA5 at $0.073384, EMA10 at $0.067475, and EMA30 at $0.053062, steeply sloping upward—confirming insane buying pressure. The 24h high is $0.084724, and MACD is screaming bullish with a massive positive spread (DIF 0.0103), indicating relentless momentum. Volume is massive (235M), but a huge pump like this often triggers massive profit-taking. I'm not chasing the top here. I'm taking partial profits near the $0.0847 resistance and holding the rest with a trailing stop above $0.073. #NFPShockSpikesRateCutOdds

#NFPShockSpikesRateCutOdds NFP Shock Rewrites the Fed Narrative: Is the Labor Market Finally Forcing a Policy Pivot? The Employment Shock That Changed the Macro Equation The U.S. labor market has delivered a signal that financial markets cannot easily ignore. July payroll growth came in dramatically weaker than the consensus narrative had implied, while previous months were revised lower. The significance goes beyond the headline number: the labor market is no longer providing policymakers with an unquestionable reason to maintain a restrictive bias. For markets, this matters because monetary policy is ultimately a function of the balance between inflation and employment. A weakening labor market reduces the Fed’s ability to justify additional tightening if inflation is simultaneously moderating. The result is a major repricing of the policy path, with investors increasingly focused on whether restrictive monetary conditions are now becoming unnecessarily tight. The critical question is no longer simply whether the Fed can hike again. It is whether the economy can absorb current rates without creating a much larger employment slowdown. Why Payroll Revisions Matter More Than the Headline A single weak payroll release can be dismissed as statistical noise. A sequence of weaker revisions is harder to ignore. When previously reported employment gains are revised lower, the market receives information that the underlying labor market was weaker than initially believed. This changes the interpretation of economic momentum. Instead of viewing July weakness as an isolated event, investors can begin asking whether hiring has been gradually losing speed for several months. That distinction is crucial for monetary policy. The Federal Reserve does not need the labor market to collapse before becoming more cautious. Its mandate requires balancing maximum employment against price stability. If employment momentum deteriorates while inflation risks become less threatening, the cost-benefit calculation surrounding further rate increases changes substantially. The Fed Is Already Holding the Line The most important development is that the Federal Reserve's July meeting has now occurred. On July 29, policymakers maintained the federal funds target range at 3.50%–3.75%. However, the decision was not unanimous: Beth Hammack, Neel Kashkari and Lorie Logan preferred a 25-basis-point increase. This creates a particularly interesting policy environment. The Fed statement continued to describe economic activity as expanding at a solid pace, while also acknowledging elevated uncertainty and inflation remaining above the 2% objective. The committee therefore did not declare victory over inflation or formally announce a dovish pivot. The market must therefore distinguish between three separate concepts: a pause, a dovish pivot and an actual easing cycle. The July decision represents a pause. A genuine pivot would require a sustained change in economic data and communication. Rate cuts would represent a much stronger policy transition. Why Bitcoin Responds So Aggressively to Labor Data Bitcoin increasingly trades as a macro-sensitive liquidity asset, particularly during periods when institutional participation is high. The transmission mechanism is straightforward. Softer employment data can reduce expectations for additional monetary tightening. Lower expected policy rates can pressure Treasury yields and the dollar, while improving the relative attractiveness of assets with higher duration and risk sensitivity. Bitcoin can benefit from that shift because its valuation is highly sensitive to global liquidity conditions and investor risk appetite. However, the relationship is not mechanical. A weak employment report can also trigger recession fears. If markets interpret falling payrolls as evidence of an approaching economic contraction rather than as a reason for easier policy, risk assets can initially decline. The difference is whether the market sees “slower growth with controlled inflation” or “slower growth because the economy is breaking.” The first environment is potentially bullish for Bitcoin. The second can produce significant volatility. Gold and Bitcoin Are Sending a Similar Macro Signal Gold's strength reinforces the importance of the real-yield story. When markets anticipate less restrictive monetary policy, the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets can decline. Gold benefits from that mechanism, while Bitcoin can benefit through a combination of liquidity expectations, declining real yields and stronger demand for alternative stores of value. The two assets are not identical, but simultaneous strength can reveal an important change in investor positioning: markets may be moving away from a pure “higher-for-longer” framework. Gold also carries a geopolitical premium. The Federal Reserve has specifically cited uncertainty associated with the Middle East conflict, while energy prices remain an important inflation variable. That means gold can remain strong even if Bitcoin temporarily experiences risk-off volatility. Oil Is the Missing Piece in the Inflation Equation Energy prices remain one of the most important variables in determining how much flexibility the Federal Reserve has. Falling crude prices can reduce headline inflation pressure and lower input costs across transportation, manufacturing and consumer industries. That potentially gives the Fed more room to respond to labor-market weakness without immediately reopening an inflation problem. But geopolitical developments complicate the equation. The Federal Reserve has explicitly noted that energy-related supply shocks have contributed to elevated inflation. Therefore, the bullish macro scenario for Bitcoin is not simply “oil falls and rates fall.” The strongest environment would be one in which energy prices remain contained while employment and inflation both moderate gradually. That combination would allow policymakers to become less restrictive without signaling economic emergency. Technical Market Structure: Momentum Needs Confirmation From a technical perspective, the most important question after a macro-driven rally is whether price can transform a short-covering move into a genuine structural reversal. For Bitcoin, the first requirement is sustained acceptance above recently lost resistance zones rather than a single intraday breakout. Traders should monitor whether rallies are accompanied by expanding spot demand and healthy market participation rather than excessive derivatives leverage. A strong bullish structure would generally feature higher highs, higher lows and successful retests of former resistance as support. A weaker structure would involve a sharp rally followed by rejection, declining volume and renewed selling around major resistance. That distinction matters because macro headlines can create powerful but temporary moves. Fundamental Crypto Outlook: Liquidity Meets Institutional Adoption The longer-term Bitcoin thesis is broader than one employment report. Institutional adoption, regulated investment products, improving market infrastructure and the growing integration of digital assets with traditional financial markets remain structural themes. However, macro liquidity determines how aggressively capital can express that thesis. A fundamentally strong asset can still decline during a liquidity contraction. Conversely, improving liquidity can accelerate demand for assets whose long-term adoption story is already established. This is why the NFP shock matters: it potentially changes the macro environment surrounding the underlying crypto adoption trend. Short-Term Outlook: Volatility Before Direction The short-term setup remains highly sensitive to incoming inflation and employment data. A dovish interpretation of upcoming economic releases could strengthen Bitcoin and other risk assets, particularly if Treasury yields and the dollar continue to soften. The opposite scenario is equally important. If inflation accelerates, energy prices rebound or economic growth proves stronger than expected, markets could rapidly rebuild expectations for restrictive monetary policy. The result would likely be higher yields, a stronger dollar and renewed pressure on speculative assets. Therefore, the next major move should not be judged solely by price. The interaction between price, volume, derivatives positioning, yields and the dollar will provide a much stronger signal. Medium-Term Outlook: Three Possible Macro Regimes The first scenario is a controlled slowdown. Employment moderates, inflation continues falling and the Fed maintains or gradually reduces restrictive policy. This is the most constructive environment for Bitcoin and broader risk assets. The second scenario is sticky inflation. Growth remains acceptable but inflation proves difficult to contain. In this environment, the Fed may remain restrictive for longer, creating a ceiling for risk-asset valuations. The third scenario is a hard slowdown. Employment deteriorates rapidly and corporate activity weakens. Although markets may initially price aggressive rate cuts, Bitcoin could experience substantial volatility as investors reduce risk exposure. The distinction between these scenarios will be determined by incoming data, not by one NFP release. Long-Term Outlook: The Policy Cycle Is Only One Variable Over a longer horizon, Bitcoin's investment case will depend on adoption, institutional capital, network economics, regulation and global liquidity. A shift toward easier monetary conditions could provide a powerful cyclical tailwind, but it cannot eliminate structural risks. Regulatory developments, market concentration, leverage, liquidity fragmentation and broader economic shocks can all influence the path. The most durable bull market would therefore be one supported simultaneously by improving liquidity, sustainable institutional demand and healthy market structure. What This Means The July employment shock has changed the macro conversation, but it has not automatically created a new bull market. The Federal Reserve has already demonstrated that it is willing to pause rather than immediately tighten further. Its July decision kept rates at 3.50%–3.75%, while three policymakers still favored a hike, proving that the committee remains divided rather than uniformly dovish. For Bitcoin, the opportunity is clear: weaker employment combined with moderating inflation could create the liquidity conditions required for another major risk-asset expansion. But confirmation is essential. The strongest bullish signal would be a combination of softer labor data, declining inflation, lower Treasury yields, a weaker dollar and sustained spot demand for Bitcoin. The strongest bearish signal would be renewed inflation pressure, stronger economic data and a rapid repricing toward higher-for-longer policy. The market is therefore entering a data-dependent phase where macroeconomic interpretation may matter more than any single headline. The July NFP shock did not prove that the Fed has entered an easing cycle. It proved something more important: the assumptions supporting further tightening are becoming increasingly difficult to defend if labor-market weakness persists. For investors, the next phase is not about predicting every Federal Reserve decision. It is about identifying whether liquidity, fundamentals and market structure are beginning to align. Research. Risk. Decide. #StockTradingShareChallenge [@Gate_Square](gt://mention/UlVAVVpbAwsO0O0O)

NFP Crashes -23K, Rate Cut Odds Flip Overnight Jobs Engine Stalling · Gold +3% · US Futures Rally — Where Does the Money Go? 📉 NFP unexpectedly drops 23K, prior months revised down 103K, labor force participation at 61.4% — lowest since 1976 🔄 Sept rate hike odds plunge from 58% to 44%, 10Y yield falls — bad news = good news logic returns 🥇 Gold surges 3% to $4,368, silver +5% — biggest winner on dual safe-haven & rate bets 📈 US futures defy logic: NDX +1.04%, SPX +0.51% — growth valuation repair window opens 🔑 Next Wednesday CPI (Aug 13) is the confirmation: 👉 Inflation also softens → Fed pivot narrative fully confirmed 👉 Inflation bounces back → expectation flip reverses, tech under pressure 💰 BTC fighting at $64K — needs to hold $65K for continuation; $62.5K is key support 👉 Full Analysis → https://www.gate.com/news/detail/nfp-plunges-by-23k-the-us-jobs-engine-stalls-rate-cut-expectations-reverse-23283101

#MoonshotAIPreIPOsOpen Moonshot AI ($KIMI) Pre-IPO Opens on Gate: A New Opportunity in the Global AI Race A major development is arriving for investors who want early exposure to one of China’s most closely watched artificial intelligence companies. Gate is opening a dedicated Pre-IPO trading market featuring Moonshot AI ($KIMI), the company behind the rapidly growing Kimi AI ecosystem. According to Gate’s announcement, the Moonshot AI Pre-IPO subscription will run from August 11 at 15:00 to August 13 at 15:00 UTC+8, with a reference subscription price of $105–$115 per share. The offering supports dual-currency subscription through USDT and GUSD, while eligible VIP users can receive additional free airdrops. Gate Pre-IPOs It is important to understand what this means. This Gate Pre-IPO opportunity is not the same as Moonshot AI already completing its public stock-market IPO. Moonshot is currently preparing for a potential Hong Kong listing, but its IPO timetable remains fluid and the company has not confirmed a definitive public-listing date. Recent reports indicate that Moonshot has been restructuring its corporate structure and working through regulatory requirements ahead of a possible listing. Moonshot AI has become one of the most important names in China’s rapidly developing AI industry. Founded in 2023, the company became widely known through its Kimi AI assistant and has continued to expand into advanced reasoning, coding, long-context processing, AI agents, research, and enterprise applications. Its rapid technological development has attracted enormous investor attention and billions of dollars in private funding. The company's valuation story is particularly impressive. Moonshot reportedly raised around $2 billion in a May 2026 financing round at a valuation near $20 billion. By late July, another financing round reportedly raised approximately $3.5 billion and valued the company around $35 billion. Other reports have indicated that Moonshot has been exploring a further pre-IPO financing round targeting a valuation as high as $50 billion. This dramatic increase in valuation shows how aggressively investors are positioning themselves around frontier AI companies. Moonshot is no longer viewed simply as a young Chinese AI startup. It is increasingly being treated as a serious competitor in the global artificial intelligence race, particularly because of the progress of its Kimi models. One of the biggest catalysts has been Kimi K3. Moonshot launched Kimi K3 with approximately 2.8 trillion parameters and positioned it as a highly capable open-weight AI model. Its capabilities focus heavily on reasoning, coding, agents, research, and complex workflows. Demand became so strong after the K3 launch that Moonshot temporarily paused new paid subscriptions because available computing capacity could not immediately keep up with demand. That situation highlights both the opportunity and the challenge facing Moonshot. Strong demand for AI services can create powerful revenue growth, but advanced AI also requires enormous computing resources. Training and serving frontier models requires expensive GPUs, data centers, electricity, networking infrastructure, and highly skilled researchers. Moonshot therefore needs substantial capital to continue expanding its computing capacity while simultaneously converting user demand into sustainable revenue. The business side is becoming increasingly important. According to reports cited by Gate, Moonshot's annual recurring revenue had reached approximately $300 million by June 2026, compared with about $100 million in March. Growth has reportedly been driven largely by API services and enterprise offerings. If this growth continues, it could become an important factor in determining whether the company can eventually justify a much higher public-market valuation. The Gate Pre-IPO offering adds another interesting dimension because it gives eligible users an opportunity to participate before a potential traditional public listing. The reference subscription price is $105–$115 per share. However, investors should understand that a reference subscription price does not guarantee that the eventual market price will be higher. After any future listing or secondary-market trading, price discovery can produce significant gains or losses depending on demand, valuation, market conditions, company performance, and investor sentiment. Gate is also offering dual-currency subscription through USDT and GUSD. The GUSD option is particularly interesting because Gate states that users can access a 3.8% flexible U.S. Treasury yield and zero-fee redemption under the relevant GUSD product structure. Gate's published GUSD information describes a 3.8% annualized yield with flexible redemption features. For VIP users, Gate is also highlighting additional free airdrops connected with the Pre-IPO opportunity. These incentives may increase the attractiveness of the campaign, but users should always check the official eligibility requirements, allocation rules, subscription limits, and terms before participating. The potential investment thesis behind Moonshot AI is built around several major factors. First is the explosive growth of global AI demand. Businesses are increasingly adopting AI for coding, customer service, research, automation, content generation, data analysis, and decision support. Second is the growing importance of AI agents capable of performing multi-step tasks rather than simply generating text. Third is the expansion of enterprise AI, APIs, and commercial model access, which could provide recurring revenue streams. Moonshot also benefits from being part of China’s rapidly expanding AI ecosystem. Chinese technology companies are competing aggressively to develop powerful foundation models while reducing inference costs and increasing commercial adoption. Moonshot’s Kimi models have therefore become part of a much larger technological race involving companies such as Alibaba, DeepSeek, Zhipu AI, MiniMax, and major international AI laboratories. However, investors should not ignore the risks. The AI industry is extremely competitive, and today's technological advantage can disappear quickly. OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Alibaba, DeepSeek, and numerous other companies are investing enormous amounts of capital into increasingly powerful models. A strong model today does not automatically guarantee a dominant business five years from now. Computing costs are another major risk. The recent Kimi K3 demand surge demonstrated that product popularity can create infrastructure bottlenecks. Moonshot must continue investing heavily in computing capacity while keeping prices competitive. If computing costs rise faster than revenue, profitability could remain under pressure even with rapid user growth. Regulatory risk is also important. Moonshot is preparing for a potential Hong Kong listing while restructuring its corporate structure and navigating China's evolving rules for strategic technology companies and foreign investment. Recent reporting indicates that state-backed investors have become involved as the company works toward satisfying regulatory requirements. These developments could support the listing process, but they also demonstrate how complex the path to a public offering can be. Valuation is perhaps the biggest investment question. A company moving from a reported valuation of roughly $4.3 billion at the end of 2025 to tens of billions of dollars in 2026 has experienced extraordinary repricing. A future valuation of $35 billion or potentially $50 billion reflects enormous expectations. To justify those expectations, Moonshot will need sustained revenue growth, strong product adoption, improving economics, technological leadership, and successful commercialization. This is why the $105–$115 reference subscription price should not be viewed in isolation. The more important question is what valuation that price represents, how many shares are outstanding, what rights investors receive, whether there are lock-up restrictions, how the Pre-IPO instrument converts or trades, and what happens if the eventual public listing is delayed. For anyone considering participation, due diligence is essential. Read Gate's official subscription terms carefully, confirm the exact asset being offered, understand allocation and settlement rules, check eligibility, and understand all risks before committing capital. Most importantly, never rely on social-media posts claiming that Moonshot AI Pre-IPO is guaranteed profit. Pre-IPO investing can involve limited liquidity, valuation risk, regulatory risk, dilution, delays, and the possibility of losing capital. The bigger picture, however, is extremely interesting. Moonshot AI has moved from a young startup to one of China's most valuable private AI companies in a remarkably short period. Kimi has developed into a major AI brand, Kimi K3 has attracted significant attention, investor funding has accelerated, and the company is preparing for a potential Hong Kong public listing. Gate’s dedicated Pre-IPO market therefore creates an important bridge between private-company opportunities and the eventual public-market stage. The combination of Moonshot AI's rapid technological development, rising private valuation, expanding commercial business, potential IPO, and Gate's Pre-IPO infrastructure makes this a development worth watching closely. The opportunity is potentially significant, but so is the risk. AI is one of the fastest-growing technology sectors in the world, yet valuations can move faster than fundamentals. Investors should focus not only on the excitement surrounding Kimi and Moonshot AI, but also on revenue, profitability, valuation, competition, regulation, infrastructure costs, and the exact terms of the Pre-IPO offering. Moonshot AI could become one of the defining AI companies of the next decade. If it successfully turns Kimi’s technological momentum into a scalable and profitable global business and eventually completes a Hong Kong listing, early investors could benefit from further growth. But no Pre-IPO price guarantees future returns. The key message is simple: Moonshot AI is a major AI story, and Gate’s Pre-IPO launch provides a new way to gain exposure before a potential public listing. But opportunity should always be combined with research, risk management, and a clear understanding of the investment structure.