Hedera to Launch v.0.65 Mainnet Upgrade on September 24

😨Bloomberg Analyst McGlone talks about #Amazon and #Bitcoin similarity but says I wouldn't be surprised if it drops to $10K 🟢$AVAX, which fell with a loaded unlock last week, turned green today 🔓It's time to unlock #OP and #HBAR tokens

XAUT vs PAXG: Side-by-Side Comparison Both XAUT (Tether Gold) and PAXG (Pax Gold) are leading tokenized gold products. Each token represents 1 troy ounce of physical LBMA-standard gold, fully allocated and held in professional vaults. Their prices track the spot gold price closely (minor premiums or discounts can appear due to crypto-market demand). Here’s a clear breakdown of the main differences: 1. Issuer & Regulatory Framework PAXG**: Issued by Paxos Trust Company. Stronger U.S. regulatory oversight (historically NYDFS; later OCC-supervised national trust). Higher compliance standards and legal clarity for many institutional and U.S.-focused users. XAUT**: Issued by TG Commodities (Tether-affiliated entity). Operates under El Salvador / offshore frameworks with FinCEN MSB registration. Less stringent traditional banking-style supervision. Edge: PAXG for regulatory strength and institutional comfort. 2. Custody Location PAXG**: Brink’s vaults in London (LBMA-accredited). XAUT**: Swiss vaults (LBMA-certified). Both are high-security professional storage. Jurisdiction preference (London vs Switzerland) is the main practical difference. 3. Audits & Transparency PAXG**: Monthly third-party attestations (typically KPMG or equivalent under AICPA standards). Holders can often look up specific bar serial numbers linked to their tokens. XAUT**: Quarterly attestations (BDO Italia under ISAE 3000). Bar lookup is also available. Edge: PAXG for more frequent independent verification. 4. Blockchain Support PAXG**: Primarily Ethereum (ERC-20). Expanded to Solana in 2026. XAUT**: Multi-chain — Ethereum, TRON, and additional networks (Mantle, BNB Chain, etc. in some reports). Edge: XAUT for lower fees and broader accessibility, especially on low-cost chains like TRON. 5. Fees PAXG**: Very low creation/redemption fees (often ~0.02% or tiered, sometimes lower for volume). No ongoing custody/storage fees. Small on-chain transfer fee possible in some setups. XAUT**: 0.25% fee on direct mint/redemption with the issuer. No ongoing custody fees. Both avoid traditional gold storage and insurance costs. 6. Liquidity & Market Size Both have multi-billion-dollar market caps (typically XAUT slightly larger or very close, depending on the exact date). 24h volumes are deep for both (often $100M–$200M+ range), supporting efficient trading. XAUT frequently shows slightly higher volume and tighter spreads in crypto-native and Asian flows. PAXG has strong presence on more regulated platforms and deeper Western DeFi integration. Edge: Slight overall liquidity advantage often goes to XAUT; PAXG wins on regulated venue coverage. 7. Physical Redemption Both allow redemption for physical gold, but minimums are high (typically one full London Good Delivery bar ≈ 430 troy ounces, worth millions at current prices). Smaller holders almost always exit by selling tokens on the secondary market rather than redeeming physical metal. Delivery locations differ (London for PAXG, Switzerland for XAUT). 8. Best Fit Choose PAXG if you prioritize**: Stronger U.S. regulatory oversight, more frequent audits, institutional-grade compliance, and clean DeFi/collateral use in Western ecosystems. Choose XAUT if you prioritize**: Multi-chain flexibility, lower transaction costs on certain networks, deeper crypto-native liquidity, and integration with the broader Tether ecosystem. Bottom Line Neither is a “stablecoin.” Both are on-chain claims on physical gold and will fluctuate with the gold price. PAXG** generally wins on regulatory transparency and audit frequency. XAUT** generally wins on multi-chain reach and trading convenience within crypto markets. Most users never redeem physical gold — they treat these as liquid, self-custodied gold exposure that can be held in a wallet, used as collateral, or sold 24/7. Always verify current fees, contract addresses, and attestation reports directly from the issuers, and size any allocation according to your own risk tolerance.$XAUT ‌$PAXG ‌

Gate Square #StockTradingShareChallenge is ongoing! Share your trades on Gate Square to grab $150,000+ ! 🏆 Top traders & analysts * up to $3,000 CFD Position Vouchers 🎁 10 lucky users daily * $500 CFD Position Vouchers each How to Participate: 1️⃣ Post with #StockTradingShareChallenge + stock-related tags or trade cards 2️⃣ Share your trading strategies Share my P&L today: https://www.gate.com/post Event Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/101038

$SCRT (Secret) – Sharp Correction, Out I'm staying far away from SCRT because it is down -24.70% at $0.02740, erasing a massive pump that reached $0.04108. The moving averages are heavily bearish with EMA5 at $0.02772, EMA10 at $0.02822, and EMA30 at $0.02991. The 24h low is $0.02672, and MACD is deeply negative. The trend is clearly down. I'm not touching this until it stabilizes. For now, I'm completely out.

#StockTradingShareChallenge 🚀 $SNDK Is Holding the Breakout. But Is It Getting Too Hot? $SNDK is still one of the interesting stocks on my list and the 1H chart is showing a very strong short-term structure. Price is currently around $1,642 after moving up over the last few days. What I like here is that buyers didn't immediately give back the breakout. Instead price has been holding around the $1,600+ area, which tells me there is still buying interest. I’m also not comfortable chasing this move without thinking. The biggest warning on my chart now is RSI at 76.78. That’s clearly in territory. It doesn't mean $SNDK has to drop. Strong stocks can stay overbought during trends. But after such a fast move the risk of a short-term pause is definitely higher. The next major resistance I’m watching is around $1,735. This is also close to the Bollinger Band so a clean breakout above this area could be important. If buyers can break $1,735 and actually hold above it then I’d consider that a fresh continuation signal than just another spike. On the hand if $SNDK gets rejected before that level I’m watching $1,512 as the first important support area. Below that the $1,460–$1,423 zone becomes more important because it lines up with the 200 EMA and 50 EMA area. The good part is that the moving-average structure remains bullish. Price is comfortably above both the 50 EMA around $1,423 and 200 EMA, around $1,460. MACD is also positive showing that momentum is still favoring buyers. So my view is simple: 🔥 Above $1,600 → bullish momentum remains 🎯 Break above $1,735 → possible continuation ⚠️ Rejection + loss of $1,512 → watch for a deeper pullback For me the interesting question isn't whether $SNDK is bullish right now. The chart clearly has strong momentum. The real question is how much higher can it go before buyers finally need a break? I’d rather see a breakout or a healthy retest than chase the stock after an already big move. What do you think. Can $SNDK break $1,735 next or is a pullback coming before the push higher? 👀👇 ‍#SNDK #StockTrading