Фьючерсы
Доступ к сотням фьючерсов
TradFi
Золото
Одна платформа мировых активов
Опционы
Hot
Торги опционами Vanilla в европейском стиле
Единый счет
Увеличьте эффективность вашего капитала
Демо-торговля
Введение в торговлю фьючерсами
Подготовьтесь к торговле фьючерсами
Фьючерсные события
Получайте награды в событиях
Демо-торговля
Используйте виртуальные средства для торговли без риска
Запуск
CandyDrop
Собирайте конфеты, чтобы заработать аирдропы
Launchpool
Быстрый стейкинг, заработайте потенциальные новые токены
HODLer Airdrop
Удерживайте GT и получайте огромные аирдропы бесплатно
Pre-IPOs
Откройте полный доступ к глобальным IPO акций
Alpha Points
Торгуйте и получайте аирдропы
Фьючерсные баллы
Зарабатывайте баллы и получайте награды аирдропа
Инвестиции
Simple Earn
Зарабатывайте проценты с помощью неиспользуемых токенов
Автоинвест.
Автоинвестиции на регулярной основе.
Бивалютные инвестиции
Доход от волатильности рынка
Мягкий стейкинг
Получайте вознаграждения с помощью гибкого стейкинга
Криптозаймы
0 Fees
Заложите одну криптовалюту, чтобы занять другую
Центр кредитования
Единый центр кредитования
Tornado Cash Case: Prosecutors Reject Defense Bid to Apply Supreme Court Ruling - Crypto Economy
TL;DR:
Federal prosecutors in the United States rejected the arguments presented by the defense of Roman Storm, co-founder of the cryptocurrency mixer Tornado Cash, which sought to apply a recent Supreme Court ruling to push for the dismissal of the criminal charges against him. In a letter addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla, prosecutors described the cited precedent as “inapplicable” to the Storm case.
Last week, Storm’s attorneys had submitted a letter to the judge pointing to the March ruling involving internet provider Cox, in which the Supreme Court determined that Cox should not be held liable for the unlawful conduct of its users in a musical copyright case. The defense argued that the same reasoning could benefit their client.
What Do the Prosecutors Say?
Prosecutors challenged that reasoning by highlighting substantial differences between the two cases. While the Supreme Court recognized that Cox actively discouraged copyright infringement, prosecutors maintain that Storm and Tornado Cash took no concrete steps to prevent the illicit use of Tornado Cash. According to the indictment, Storm implemented more than 250 changes to the protocol‘s infrastructure during the period under investigation, internally discussed measures to limit criminal activity, and deliberately chose not to implement them. Prosecutors also claim that Storm lied to victims by telling them he had little control over the protocol.
“The defendant’s response to the criminal use of his business was, at best, mere window dressing and, at worst, deliberate misdirection,” prosecutors wrote in their letter.

The Tornado Cash Trial Seems to Have No End
Storm was found guilty in August on one count of unlicensed money transmission, though the jury failed to reach a verdict on the two remaining counts related to money laundering and sanctions evasion. Last month, prosecutors formally requested the holding of a new trial to resolve those charges, suggesting it begin in October 2026.
The case has drawn support from within the industry Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, stated in January that he is an active user of privacy tools and highlighted the technical quality of Storm’s work on Tornado Cash. The proceedings were initiated during the Biden administration and remain one of the most closely watched cases for their potential implications for the development of privacy software in cryptocurrencies.