Question 1

What is MATH?

Accepted Answer

MATH is the primary token identified in MathChain documentation and is also listed in materials for the MathWallet ecosystem. It does not exist solely as a single on-chain contract: the official token page separately lists versions on Ethereum ERC-20, BNB Chain BEP-20, Arbitrum and Base ERC-20, Solana SPL, and Metis. Therefore, when seeing a balance also labeled “MATH,” you must first confirm its network and corresponding contract. Earlier MathChain documentation also describes MATH as a token related to transaction fees, cross-chain message fees, governance participation, and MathWallet service fees on that chain. This is how project materials define its functions; it does not mean that every listed network version automatically has the same use in every scenario.

Question 2

Which officially listed network versions of MATH are available, and why must you verify the network when transferring?

Accepted Answer

The MATH versions currently listed on the official token page include Ethereum ERC-20, BNB Chain BEP-20, Arbitrum ERC-20, Base ERC-20, Solana SPL, and Metis ERC-20. The network name, token standard, and contract address together identify the same asset; the name or ticker “MATH” alone is insufficient to confirm the receiving asset. Before depositing or withdrawing, check the network and contract item by item on the official token page and the deposit/withdrawal page of the wallet or platform you use. The network selected by the sender must match the version of that network supported by the receiver; otherwise, even if the address format appears usable, the assets may not be credited as expected or may require an additional recovery process.

Question 3

How can MATH on different networks be bridged?

Accepted Answer

MATH on different networks should not be treated as a single on-chain balance that can be transferred freely and directly. The official token page currently explicitly lists two cross-chain entry points: the MathWallet Cloud page for ERC-20 and BEP-20, and Arbitrum Bridge for Ethereum and Arbitrum; the page does not thereby state that the same official direct route exists between any other two versions. The key to a cross-chain operation is not sending tokens to an ordinary address on another network, but using a bridge process appropriate for the originating and destination networks. The asset status before and after bridging, required network fees, and arrival time depend on the selected bridge and the two networks; if the needed route is not listed on the official page, first confirm the actual support scope of the receiving side and the bridge rather than assuming that all MATH versions are interoperable.

Question 4

What were MATH’s historical issuance and initial allocation?

Accepted Answer

MathChain’s historical token documentation records that MATH had an initial maximum total supply of 200 million tokens, with the initial allocation divided into 60% (120 million) for the MathVault Pool, 30% (60 million) for professional investors, and 10% (20 million) for LockDrop investors. This describes the initial issuance and allocation structure recorded in the documentation. Initial allocation is not the same as current circulating supply: whether allocations have been distributed, locked, burned, or remain undistributed can make the tradable amount different from the historical figures above. Especially given later announcements of buyback burns and burns of undistributed VPoS allocations, neither 200 million tokens nor any initial percentage can be used directly to calculate today’s circulating supply or an individual’s obtainable allocation.

Question 5

How does MATH’s buyback-and-burn mechanism work, and what did the most recent execution do?

Accepted Answer

A MathWallet announcement states that the MATH buyback-and-burn practice uses 20% of revenue from the relevant period to buy back MATH and then burns the repurchased tokens. The process first obtains tokens in the market using a portion of revenue, then executes an on-chain burn; it affects the amount actually repurchased and burned, rather than automatically reducing every holder’s balance by a fixed percentage. The most recent verifiable announcement states that the project used 20% of revenue from July 1 to September 30, 2026, to buy back and burn 9,168 MATH, and it also provides an Ethereum on-chain transaction record. The buyback amount, quantity that can be repurchased, and amount burned in each period vary with the relevant revenue and execution results; therefore, the amount for one quarter cannot be extrapolated as a fixed pace, nor can it guarantee price performance.

Question 6

What does the closure of MathVault (VPoS) mean for MATH holders and supply?

Accepted Answer

MathVault (VPoS) officially closed on October 21, 2026; the announcement explicitly states that reward accrual, including MATH mining rewards, stopped on that date. Therefore, the former MathVault staking/mining entry point should no longer be understood as a participation channel that can continue generating MATH rewards. The closure changed two different things: for participants, future rewards no longer accrue; for undistributed project allocations, the announcement states that all MATH allocated to the VPoS mining program but not yet distributed will be burned and permanently removed from the token supply. The latter applies to undistributed program allocations and does not mean that MATH already in users’ wallets will be automatically burned.

Question 7

What uses and governance relationships does MATH have in MathChain materials?

Accepted Answer

In MathChain’s historical documentation, MATH is listed as a token related to transaction fees, cross-chain message fees, governance participation, and MathWallet service fees. Regarding governance, holders can vote on referendum proposals, and the documentation also states that users and elected committees can submit referendum proposals. These are MathChain documentation’s descriptions of its on-chain governance and token uses. Holding MATH on one network does not automatically prove eligibility to vote in a particular interface or access to an available service; actual operation also depends on the network in use, whether the application supports it, and the on-chain or product rules at that time.

Question 8

How should changes in MATH supply be understood without conflating different mechanisms?

Accepted Answer

When assessing changes in MATH supply, three types of records should be considered separately: the historical initial issuance design, burns that have been executed after revenue-funded buybacks, and burns of undistributed allocations in the VPoS program. Their triggers and targets differ: the first is an allocation framework, the second uses 20% of revenue from the relevant period as its funding source, and the third relates to the remaining allocation of the closed VPoS program. Therefore, a single “maximum supply” figure or a single burn announcement is insufficient to fully describe the current tradable supply. To verify a specific change, review the period covered by the announcement, the burn amount, and the on-chain record; to assess a balance on a particular network, also return to that network’s official contract and block explorer, rather than directly adding or substituting token balances from another network.

MATH (MATH) Price

MATH (MATH) Price Performance

Fear & Greed Index

Why Did MATH (MATH) Fall in the Last 24 Hours?

About MATH (MATH)

Use Cases and Features

Supply and Issuance Mechanism

How to Buy and Use MATH (MATH)

How to Buy

Related Markets

MATH (MATH) Basics & Market Insights

Fundamentals

Market Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions About MATH (MATH)