Recently, there's been a bit of information overload, with dozens of messages in the group at once, and KOLs opening their microphones to talk about "logic" and "narrative," which makes people easily get itchy hands. To put it simply, impulsively paying—neither group messages nor KOLs will lose money for you, at most they will find reasons for you. Especially now, with the criticism that pledging and shared security are "copycat" schemes, I think the core of the controversy isn't about who is right or wrong, but that everyone wants to shift the risk outward: projects claim to have design, KOLs say there is cognition, group members say it's just following the trend... in the end, the one who pays the price is still oneself. Forget it, to put it plainly: I now see a lot of "compound returns," and I ask first—who will bear the brunt when things go bad? Can the code and time give an answer? If not, better not to move first.

شاهد النسخة الأصلية
قد تحتوي هذه الصفحة على محتوى من جهات خارجية، يتم تقديمه لأغراض إعلامية فقط (وليس كإقرارات/ضمانات)، ولا ينبغي اعتباره موافقة على آرائه من قبل Gate، ولا بمثابة نصيحة مالية أو مهنية. انظر إلى إخلاء المسؤولية للحصول على التفاصيل.
  • أعجبني
  • تعليق
  • إعادة النشر
  • مشاركة
تعليق
إضافة تعليق
إضافة تعليق
لا توجد تعليقات
  • تثبيت