Question 1

How should SOLR's historical rules be distinguished from the 2024 RAZR migration announcement?

Accepted Answer

SOLR's historical documents describe the SolRazr token and its original mechanisms. On 28 February 2024, the project announced a migration from SOLR to RAZR and said that the migration portal, dates, and window would be announced later. This is therefore a migration plan, not evidence that a token swap was completed, and the old SOLR rules should not be treated as RAZR entitlements. The staking and lottery rules below refer only to the historical version.

Question 2

What quantity, term, and lottery-ticket limits applied under the historical SOLR staking rules?

Accepted Answer

According to SolRazr's historical staking FAQ, the minimum stake was 100 SOLR, the available term was 2 to 8 weeks, and each wallet could earn at most 8 lottery tickets. Tickets became available immediately after staking, so they could be used in the then-current whitelist lottery without waiting for the staking term to end.

Question 3

Could SOLR be withdrawn early during the historical staking term?

Accepted Answer

Under the historical rules, staking could not be ended before the originally chosen term expired. The documentation explained that lottery tickets were awarded as soon as a user selected the initial term and staked, so users could not exit at any time after receiving tickets.

Question 4

How did unstaking after the historical term ended affect unused lottery tickets?

Accepted Answer

The historical rules allowed unstaking after the initial staking term ended. Once a wallet unstaked, its unused lottery tickets were purged immediately. Thus, exiting after the term and retaining lottery tickets were different choices; unused tickets did not remain after exit.

Question 5

How did historical restaking retain or change parameters, and was it automatic?

Accepted Answer

In the historical mechanism, restaking after the initial term defaulted to the original staking details. Parameters could be changed on restaking only by increasing the token amount or extending the term; neither amount nor term could be reduced. The FAQ described automatic restaking as a future plan, so that version should not be described as supporting automatic renewal.

Question 6

Did the historical rules allow one wallet to enter the lottery across different tiers?

Accepted Answer

No. SolRazr's historical rules said that one wallet could not participate in different tiers at the same time, such as both Seed and Sapling. Each tier ran a lottery based on the tickets submitted for that tier to select allocated wallets; entering multiple tiers was not an available participation method.

Question 7

Did participation in a historical IDO lottery require using all tickets at once?

Accepted Answer

No. The historical rules allowed a wallet to submit only some of its lottery tickets. If that entry won, the halving rule applied only to the tickets submitted in that entry; tickets not submitted were unaffected by that reduction. Submitting only part of the tickets did not itself mean that an allocation had been won.

Question 8

How were tickets halved and rounded after a win in the historical lottery?

Accepted Answer

The historical rule halved only the tickets actually submitted in a winning round; a fractional remainder was rounded up, while tickets not submitted were retained separately. For example, a wallet with 8 tickets that submitted 6 and won had 3 of the submitted tickets left plus the 2 not submitted, or 5 in total. A post-reduction result of 2.5 tickets was counted as 3.

Question 9

Did tickets expire after an unsuccessful historical lottery entry?

Accepted Answer

In the historical FAQ example, a wallet holding 8 tickets that did not receive an allocation retained all 8 as long as it did not unstake, and could use them in later lotteries. Retaining tickets meant retaining an opportunity to participate; a later allocation still depended on the lottery outcome.

Question 10

How did historical tiers differ in allocation amount per ticket and maximum allocations?

Accepted Answer

Under the historical rules, every winning ticket had the same allocation amount across tiers, but the maximum number of allocations differed. Mighty Oak could win up to the number of submitted tickets, capped at 8; Tree up to half the submitted tickets; Sapling up to one quarter; and Seed and Soil up to 1 allocation each regardless of tickets submitted. These were maximums, not promises of an allocation in every case.

Question 11

Was KYC still required after winning a historical IDO lottery?

Accepted Answer

Yes. SolRazr's historical staking and IDO rules required a winner to complete KYC before participating in the IDO. Even a wallet that won an allocation could not participate without completing KYC; winning did not replace that eligibility requirement.

Question 12

What were the participation amount and unlock schedule for SolRazr's own historical public IDO?

Accepted Answer

SolRazr's own historical public IDO fixed participation at 300 USDC, with no higher or lower amount allowed. Of the allocated SOLR, 50% unlocked at the token generation event (TGE), followed by 10% each month for 5 months. This describes the unlock schedule for allocated tokens. These amount and unlock terms applied only to the project's own public IDO, not as a general rule for later project pools.

SolRazr (SOLR) Price