Question 1

What is RACA?

Accepted Answer

RACA is the native utility token of the USM Metaverse and is also positioned as the governance token of RACA DAO. Within this ecosystem, it connects metaverse asset trading, game-related acquisition methods, and governance positioning, rather than being USM Land, an NFT, or a game item itself. Radio Caca project materials also associate it with USM, Metamon, and MPB NFTs. They are different products or asset types within the same ecosystem: RACA is a token, Land and MPB are NFT assets, and Metamon is an associated game.

Question 2

What can RACA be used for?

Accepted Answer

The official token documentation explicitly lists purchasing and trading USM Land and other NFT assets as uses: users use RACA as a medium of exchange, while whether a transaction can be completed also depends on the relevant marketplace, the asset's availability for sale, and the product rules at the time. Therefore, “RACA can be used for NFTs” does not mean it can automatically be exchanged for any NFT, nor that holding RACA grants a right to a particular parcel of land or NFT. Ownership of an asset is determined by the specific transaction and on-chain records.

Question 3

What does RACA's positioning as a governance token mean?

Accepted Answer

RACA is positioned as a RACA DAO governance token, meaning that it is designed for the decentralized-governance context of this ecosystem. This positioning itself does not mean that every holder automatically receives fixed voting rights, dividends, or direct control over a product. Who can submit proposals, how voting power is calculated, when votes pass, and how they are executed must be determined by the DAO's rules or proposals at the time. The official token page confirms the governance-token positioning, but does not provide universally applicable voting thresholds and weighting parameters on that page.

Question 4

What is RACA's supply?

Accepted Answer

According to the official token documentation, RACA had an initial total supply of 500,000,000,000 tokens, with 68,581,766,730 tokens burned, and the total supply listed by the documentation is 431,418,233,270 tokens. This result equals the initial supply minus the stated burn amount. “Total supply” here is the supply definition used on the documentation page and cannot be treated directly as real-time circulating supply: it does not separately state how many tokens were tradable, locked, or held at what types of addresses at the time. For real-time figures, on-chain data and relevant product rules should be checked separately.

Question 5

Can RACA be earned through games?

Accepted Answer

Yes, but not unconditionally in the sense of “playing once earns a fixed amount.” Official documentation states that players can earn RACA through playing games and mining; actual eligibility, tasks, settlement frequency, and amounts are determined by the rules of the specific game or event. This acquisition method differs from direct purchase: rewards generally require satisfying the relevant game or event conditions, and may change because an event ends, rules are adjusted, or eligibility is restricted. Before participating, users should follow the rules on the corresponding product page.

Question 6

What do RACA's multichain supply records indicate?

Accepted Answer

Official documentation lists RACA as a multichain token on BNB Chain, Ethereum, and OKT Chain, and provides records of the same token address on these networks. The distribution records on that page are 276,291,470,925 tokens on BNB Chain, 149,493,751,345 tokens on Ethereum, and 5,633,011,000 tokens on OKT Chain; the three total the total supply listed on the page. Multichain distribution indicates that the supply of the same asset is recorded separately by chain; it does not itself state whether users can transfer it free of charge or automatically between any two chains. Cross-chain operations still depend on supported bridge paths, contracts, and service rules.

Question 7

What is the relationship between USM, Metamon, MPB, and RACA?

Accepted Answer

USM is the metaverse project described in Radio Caca materials, and RACA is its native utility token; Metamon is a game associated with the ecosystem, while MPB is an NFT mentioned in project materials. RACA may therefore play payment-, reward-, or governance-related roles under the rules of these scenarios. The three are not interchangeable: holding RACA does not mean holding USM Land, Metamon-related assets, or MPB NFTs; the ownership, uses, and trading rules of each asset should be assessed according to its own contract and product rules.

Question 8

What supply-level change does RACA's burn record bring?

Accepted Answer

Burning causes burned RACA to no longer be included in the total supply listed in the documentation, reducing the page figure from an initial supply of 500 billion tokens to approximately 431.418 billion tokens. Based on the figures listed on that page, the reduction is approximately 68.582 billion tokens. A supply reduction alone does not imply that the price will necessarily rise or fall. Price also depends on trading depth, buying and selling demand, tradable supply, and market expectations; moreover, the page's supply records are not real-time market data.

Radio Caca (RACA) Price