Question 1

What game-related payments was PXL intended for in the historical roadmap?

Accepted Answer

The roadmap revised on December 31, 2021 described PXL as the utility token of the POTUS ecosystem. It was intended to pay for in-game assets, perks, and services in upcoming projects. This was a plan for use at the time, not confirmation that all of those payment functions were implemented.

Question 2

Does holding PXL automatically give a holder voting rights in the roadmap?

Accepted Answer

No. The historical roadmap assigned game utility to PXL, while voting on the direction of PixelPotus and the team’s future projects was assigned to pxlDAO. The plan did not state that every PXL holder automatically qualified to take part in those votes.

Question 3

Can the historical statement “100 million minted” be treated as circulating supply?

Accepted Answer

No. The late-2021 roadmap listed 100 million tokens minted, but that figure included locked private-sale allocations and escrow allocations to be unlocked in tranches as gameplay demand required. Minted supply therefore cannot be equated directly with circulating supply. The roadmap also said allocation figures could change as the project evolved, so this historical number alone cannot establish a permanent supply cap.

Question 4

What eligibility and snapshot were used for the 2021 PXL airdrop?

Accepted Answer

The historical plan allocated 1,000,000 PXL (1%) to an airdrop for the top 500 PixelPotus players, distributed proportionally by rarity score. It used a snapshot of that score at midnight UTC on November 23, 2021. It was therefore neither an equal distribution to all token holders nor a recalculation from collection rankings obtained later.

Question 5

How were the historical private-sale, advisor, and team allocations locked and released?

Accepted Answer

The historical roadmap allocated 15 million PXL (15%) to the private sale, 5 million (5%) to advisors, and 10 million (10%) to the team. Each category was stated to have a three-month lockup followed by a five-month gradual release. This schedule should not be generalized as a single unlock rule for all PXL.

Question 6

Did the historical PXL escrow allocation have fixed unlock dates?

Accepted Answer

The historical roadmap reserved 37.5 million PXL, or 37.5%, for escrow, to be unlocked in tranches as needed to meet gameplay demand. The term gave no fixed calendar dates and did not promise equal-sized tranches; it described a release arrangement for an existing escrow allocation.

Question 7

How did the historical POTUS Debates card-collection plan use fragments?

Accepted Answer

In the historical roadmap, players could claim fragments and combine them into one-, two-, and three-star tactic cards in preparation for the game. This was the card-preparation mechanism announced at the time; it does not establish that fragment combining opened as planned.

Question 8

Who was intended to receive merchandise-profit sharing in the Pixel Shop plan?

Accepted Answer

The historical Pixel Shop plan assigned a percentage of merchandise profit to owners of Unique POTUS, so eligibility was linked to that POTUS NFT rarity. It did not describe the share as a benefit for every PXL holder, and it does not establish that profit sharing was implemented.

Question 9

How was the POTUS Debates campaign mode designed in the historical plan?

Accepted Answer

The planned campaign mode had players travel back in time to debate each president, encountering treasure rooms and pop-up Pixel markets along the way. This was a gameplay-flow design in the roadmap and should not be presented as a mode that was already available.

Question 10

What did the historical PvP design require players to bring, and what was its objective?

Accepted Answer

The historical PvP plan described a turn-based strategy card game. A player would select a Legendary or Unique POTUS from their collection and bring a 15-card deck of debate tactics. The objective was to exhaust the opponent’s fortitude while managing one’s own; these were rules in the design at that time.

Question 11

Which features were planned alongside Rent-a-POTUS in the historical roadmap?

Accepted Answer

Rent-a-POTUS was listed as a POTUS rental system together with ranked matchmaking and tournaments. The plan connects rentals with competitive play, but it provides no basis for current rental terms, fees, or settlement rules, and it does not confirm that those features went live.

Question 12

What participation method and minimum applied to the historical PXL private sale?

Accepted Answer

The historical private sale used XTZ to purchase PXL, with a minimum contribution of 500 XTZ, no stated maximum, and a first-come, first-served basis. These were historical sale terms, not an available purchase channel. Participation also required agreement to the terms, confirmation of not being a United States citizen, and compliance with the page’s IP-based restrictions for certain jurisdictions.

PixelPotus (PXL) Price

Fear & Greed Index

About PixelPotus (PXL)

Use Cases and Features

Supply and Issuance Mechanism

Frequently Asked Questions About PixelPotus (PXL)