Question 1

What is NAORIS, and what does holding it represent?

Accepted Answer

NAORIS is a utility crypto-asset for the NaoX network, used to access network services and participate in its network activities; it is not equity, a claim on profits, or evidence of ownership in the issuer. The underlying network and related technology are licensed by Naoris Quantum Protocol Inc., while the token issuer and operating entity described in the whitepaper are NaoX-related entities; therefore, holding the token itself does not amount to acquiring corporate interests in either the technology provider or the issuer.

Question 2

What problem does Naoris Protocol aim to solve?

Accepted Answer

NaoX is described as an EVM-compatible, post-quantum cryptography Layer 1. Its objective is to have connected devices participate in continuous integrity verification rather than relying on traditional proof-of-work mining. Devices jointly check each other's trust status; when a node shows signs of malicious behavior or compromise, the design objective is to mark and isolate it promptly, reducing the effect of a single point of failure on the network. “Post-quantum” means that its cryptographic design is intended to address risks of cryptographic attacks that future quantum computing may create; it does not mean that users' private keys, endpoints, or applications cannot naturally be compromised. Users must still protect their private keys; if a private key is lost or a transaction is sent to an incorrect address, the whitepaper notes that the resulting loss is generally irreversible.

Question 3

How is NAORIS used to pay network fees?

Accepted Answer

NAORIS can be used to settle the cost of network services. Triggering scenarios listed in the whitepaper include deploying applications, calling APIs, and starting nodes; network fees and bandwidth costs generated by these operations are settled in NAORIS among participants. Accordingly, the token's use is tied to actually using these services, rather than fixed returns arising merely from holding it. Fees are not the same for every operation: ordinary transfers use a lightweight fee model, while more complex operations, such as multisignature verification or larger data payloads, may pay higher fees because of additional computation. The whitepaper describes a sub-one-cent baseline fee as a design objective; actual costs paid still depend on the specific operation and network rules.

Question 4

How does Proof-of-Security work, and how does it differ from traditional mining?

Accepted Answer

A key network mechanism is Proof-of-Security: connected devices jointly verify and propagate state changes while continuously assessing each other's trust status. Unlike PoW, which competes to produce blocks through computing power, it does not presuppose energy-intensive mining; unlike traditional PoS, which selects validators solely by token holdings, the whitepaper emphasizes real-time verification at the device layer and random, lightweight role selection. Verification results affect network security and incentives. The whitepaper states that devices meeting verification conditions may receive periodic rewards, while devices with better accuracy and online performance may receive additional incentives; offline or malicious devices may receive fewer or no rewards. The disclosures also describe a design in which devices or operators stake NAORIS and malicious or persistently offline behavior may result in slashing, so eligibility, rewards, and penalties should all be based on the protocol rules live at that time.

Question 5

When participating in validation or staking, where do rewards come from?

Accepted Answer

The main funding relationship for verification rewards is that part of transaction fees is pooled and allocated to active devices providing continuous verification services, while another part may enter a sustainability reserve for network maintenance or upgrades. In other words, rewards are linked to verification services and fee flows, not to a fixed interest rate or guaranteed yield promised by the whitepaper. The whitepaper also lists staking and delegated staking as ways to participate in network operations or validation, and explicitly states that governance and staking functions were intended to progress according to a phased plan after mainnet. Before assessing whether participation is possible, when withdrawal is available, or whether slashing may occur, users should confirm the protocol interface and effective rules at that time, rather than treating planned descriptions as functions available in all circumstances.

Question 6

Does holding NAORIS mean holding shares or voting rights in the project company?

Accepted Answer

No. The boundary of rights for NAORIS is access to and use of NaoX ecosystem services and, where applicable, participation in network validation; the whitepaper explicitly excludes equity, profit rights, and ownership in NaoX. Transferability of the token does not change this boundary. Governance should likewise be distinguished from corporate rights. The whitepaper lists participation in governance mechanisms as a possible use and states that governance functionality was expected to be implemented in a later phase; even if a form of on-chain governance is enabled, it is generally participation in proposals or parameter decisions under protocol rules, not shareholder voting rights in a company.

Question 7

What is the relationship between network use and demand for NAORIS?

Accepted Answer

Potential usage demand for NAORIS is related to use of network services, node or validation participation, and integration by ecosystem applications: users or devices pay fees for services, and part of those fees then flows to active validators and reserves. Therefore, increased service calls may increase settlement demand, but this is not a promise that the token price will necessarily rise or that participants will necessarily profit. Whether this relationship holds is also affected by whether actual functions are deployed, user adoption, market liquidity, regulatory restrictions, and overall market conditions. The whitepaper also notes that the asset may decline in value and may not always be transferable or liquid; there is no automatic one-to-one relationship between use cases and market price.

Question 8

What do EVM compatibility and the ERC-20 standard mean for using NAORIS?

Accepted Answer

The project positions NaoX as an EVM-compatible network, meaning developers can develop or interact around an Ethereum Virtual Machine-compatible tooling and application environment; this does not mean every Ethereum application can be deployed without changes, nor that assets automatically move across chains. Cross-network use still depends on whether the relevant applications, bridges, and wallets actually provide support. At the token layer, the whitepaper states that the native token uses the ERC-20 standard to improve interoperability with existing tools and trading venues. Standards compatibility solves only part of the issue of token interfaces and tool compatibility; it does not replace a user's verification of contract addresses, network selection, and bridging paths.

Question 9

How can available NAORIS functions be distinguished from planned functions?

Accepted Answer

The functional status in the whitepaper should be understood by phase: it separately listed testnet/early access, mainnet service access, and post-mainnet governance and staking, with the latter two categories subject to expectations or conditions related to ecosystem readiness. A function appearing in the whitepaper does not by itself prove that it is usable at all times, in all regions, or in every product interface. For users, the proper sequence is first to confirm whether the network and service being used are open, then confirm whether they meet wallet, node, staking, or compliance conditions, and only then review fees, lockups, rewards, and exit rules. This avoids mistaking testing, plans, or a feature of one product for a generally available token right.

Question 10

Can NAORIS be freely transferred?

Accepted Answer

NAORIS can be transferred within the protocol ecosystem or on public blockchains, but not without conditions. The whitepaper states that the protocol itself has no technical transfer restrictions, while also noting that users may be subject to KYC/AML and local legal requirements when interacting with regulated services or trading venues. A successful transfer also does not mean it is reversible or risk-free: blockchain transactions generally cannot be reversed after validation, and transfers to an incorrect address generally cannot be recovered. Before transferring, users should verify the selected network, recipient address, and whether the recipient supports the asset; these operational conditions are separate from whether one owns the token.

Question 11

What practical meaning does post-quantum security have for users, and what can it not guarantee?

Accepted Answer

Post-quantum security is first a direction for protocol cryptography and verification architecture: the whitepaper mentions signatures and hash technologies aligned with post-quantum standards, as well as multi-device verification to identify anomalies. It aims to reduce certain infrastructure and cryptographic attack risks, rather than guaranteeing absolute security for every device, smart contract, private-key management practice, or external service. Accordingly, protocol-layer protections must still be distinguished from user-layer responsibilities in actual use. Improper private-key custody, failures of third-party wallets or trading venues, code vulnerabilities, and network anomalies can all affect the security of assets or services; post-quantum design cannot eliminate these risks.

Question 12

Why are NAORIS fees, rewards, and network security related to one another?

Accepted Answer

Fees, rewards, and security mechanisms form one cycle: service calls generate fees, active devices provide validation, and the protocol then uses part of the fees to reward validators and maintain a network reserve. Its purpose is to connect security-service provision with the costs of operating the network. However, the cycle does not mean fee income, reward amounts, or market returns are fixed. Fees vary with operational complexity, validation eligibility and performance affect rewards, and functions may be adjusted through protocol updates or governance; the whitepaper expressly states that token-related rights and conditions may be modified through established procedures.

NAORIS (NAORIS) Price