Question 1

What was the snapshot of CCY holders on Avalanche for, and what was planned for the FT4 token on Chromia?

Accepted Answer

A snapshot of CCY holders on Avalanche was taken on January 31, 2025. At the time, the plan was to distribute an FT4 version of the token on the Chromia mainnet. This establishes the snapshot date and the planned distribution network, but does not establish that the distribution was later completed.

Question 2

How does ChoccySwap combine liquidity pools and an order book?

Accepted Answer

ChoccySwap is described as an exchange platform for FT4 assets in the Chromia ecosystem that combines liquidity pools and an order book. Its roadmap also listed order-book implementation as in progress, with plans to add it to the AMM swap platform so users could make more precise trades within asset pairs. This describes the platform’s intended functionality, not confirmation that the order book had been implemented. The roadmap also listed order-book performance testing as in progress, aiming to assess whether a hybrid model combining automated pools and order-book trading was feasible. That does not mean the testing or hybrid model had been completed.

Question 3

Why did ChoccySwap initially use a Uniswap v2-like codebase, and what was the status of v3 mechanics?

Accepted Answer

The project’s README linked its initial use of a Uniswap v2-like codebase to its assessment of Chromia’s adoption at the time: because Chromia had limited use, trading pairs might have little liquidity and prices might vary widely. The project therefore chose a more intuitive, easier-to-understand v2-like codebase for its initial approach, connecting that choice with user protection. This was not a guarantee of stable prices or particular outcomes for users. The README listed v3 mechanics as a later plan, not as an implementation that had already been completed.

Question 4

How were trading fees and fixed fees arranged at the time?

Accepted Answer

At the time, the GitHub README said the implemented Uniswap v2 clone charged no transaction fees and that no fixed transaction fees had been set; whether to add fees was left to the DAO. This describes the arrangement at the stage covered by the README and does not establish the platform’s current fee rules.

Question 5

How can CCY be used in ChoccySwap governance?

Accepted Answer

CCY can be used to vote on ChoccySwap’s governance platform. This connects the token with governance voting, but does not establish voting weights, a proposal process, or the outcome of any vote.

Question 6

What steps and objectives did ChoccySwap’s order-book roadmap include?

Accepted Answer

At the time, ChoccySwap’s roadmap listed both order-book implementation and performance testing as in progress. The implementation plan was to add an order book to the AMM swap platform so users could make more precise trades within asset pairs. The performance tests were intended to assess the feasibility of combining automated pools with order-book trading. These were roadmap items in progress, not confirmation that the functionality had been completed.

Question 7

How did ChoccySwap plan to expand its liquidity pools?

Accepted Answer

The roadmap planned to establish liquidity pools linked to tokens from key participants in the Chromia ecosystem, broadening the trading environment and reflecting the ecosystem’s diversity. This was a planned item at the time, not evidence that the pools had been established.

Question 8

What features were included in ChoccySwap’s NFT trading concept?

Accepted Answer

The NFT trading concept included selling, buying, auctioning, and creating NFTs. The project envisioned enabling these transactions on Chromia so that game items could be exchanged seamlessly between different games in the ecosystem. These features were ideas in progress at the time, not confirmation that they had launched.

Question 9

What lending concept did ChoccySwap propose for game assets?

Accepted Answer

The concept was to use earnings from one game to obtain a loan and make progress in another, then repay the loan after earning those funds back through upgrades. This was a project idea at the time, not an available lending product.

Question 10

What were CCY’s total supply and self-reported circulating supply?

Accepted Answer

The page listed CCY’s total supply as 108.85 million and its self-reported circulating supply as 108.85 million. It did not list a maximum-supply figure. The circulating-supply figure was labeled as self-reported and should not be treated as independently verified.

Question 11

What was CCY’s listing status on KuCoin, and which network did the page identify?

Accepted Answer

The KuCoin page stated that CCY had not yet been officially listed on the platform. It identified the contract network as Avalanche C-Chain, but that network label does not mean CCY was listed or available to trade on KuCoin.

Question 12

How did the change from ChoccySwap to Choccy relate to the CCY snapshot?

Accepted Answer

ChoccySwap rebranded as Choccy. On January 31, 2025, the project took a snapshot of CCY holders on Avalanche; at the time, an FT4 version of the token was planned for distribution on the Chromia mainnet. This describes the plan at that time and does not establish that the distribution was completed.

ChoccySwap (CCY) Price

Price of ChoccySwap (CCY) Today in USD

Fear & Greed Index

About ChoccySwap (CCY)

Use Cases and Features

Supply and Issuance Mechanism

ChoccySwap (CCY) Basics & Market Insights

Fundamentals

Frequently Asked Questions About ChoccySwap (CCY)