#PI# Repost: Focus on the Common Well-being of Humanity: Reject Divisive Noise and Jointly Build a Harmonious Global Home

Currently, some voices worldwide have strayed from the core track of humanity’s common interests: excessive hype around extraterrestrial topics, inappropriate use of terms related to war and terrorism in political discourse, one-sided dissemination of negative cases, distorted interpretations of anti-corruption issues, and certain remarks aimed at constructing a system of global confrontation. These contents frequently appear in speeches by leaders of various countries and media reports. While they should have served global governance and problem-solving, they often lead to misunderstandings among irrelevant ordinary people who fear "being affected themselves" due to information biases in dissemination, thereby invisibly intensifying confrontational sentiments in global society.

As a result, we witness a contradictory cycle: endless speeches yet failing to build consensus, numerous governance measures yet failing to resolve differences, repeated conflicts and disputes, and arduous problem-solving processes. More critically, many of these actions do not directly advance humanity’s core needs such as increasing economic income and improving health security; instead, they consume substantial social resources and deviate from the true expectations of people around the world. What people truly desire is a higher quality of income, longer-term health security, and a harmonious and secure global home free from the threats of war, environmental pollution, the spread of diseases, hunger, and conflicts—a bright future where all humanity works together to create and share well-being.

I. Summary of Core Issues: "Ineffective Consumption" Deviating from People’s Needs

1. Discourse orientation deviating from core interests: Some public discourses focus on non-livelihood topics and confrontational expressions, ignoring the most pressing practical needs of global citizens, such as "increasing income," "protecting health," and "guarding the home." This disperses public resources and social attention.
2. Information dissemination triggering misunderstandings and confrontation: Complex issues are prone to interpretation biases after dissemination. Due to information asymmetry, ordinary people may exaggerate local issues into "global threats," leading to panic or confrontational attitudes and undermining the foundation of social consensus.
3. Governance actions disconnecting from people’s needs: Some governance measures fail to focus on key areas such as "poverty alleviation, pollution control, disease prevention, and war prevention"; instead, they fall into a cycle of "solving one conflict while creating another," failing to bring tangible improvements to people’s well-being.

II. Solutions: Building a Globally Coordinated Action System with "People’s Livelihoods at Its Core"

(I) Reshape the Public Discourse System: Focus on Consensus and Reduce Confrontation

1. Establish "livelihood-oriented" discourse guidelines: When making public statements, leaders of various countries and media should take people’s livelihood issues—such as "increasing people’s income," "improving health security," and "promoting ecological protection"—as the core. They should reduce the inappropriate use of terms related to war and confrontation and avoid deliberately creating camp-based conflicts.
2. Promote a "rational dissemination" mechanism: Media organizations need to establish a dissemination standard of "prioritizing global interests." For content related to global governance, they should first explain its connection to people’s daily lives (e.g., how a policy affects employment and medical care) rather than hyping up conflicts. At the same time, multiple perspectives should be introduced to avoid misunderstandings caused by one-sided reports.

(II) Focus on Core Needs: Concentrate Resources to Address "People’s Most Pressing Concerns"

1. Globally coordinated efforts to enhance economic well-being:
- Developed and developing countries should work together to promote inclusive industrial cooperation (such as sharing agricultural technologies and rational allocation of manufacturing capacity) to help underdeveloped regions create jobs and increase residents’ income.
- International organizations should take the lead in establishing a "Global Income Security Fund" to provide skill training and entrepreneurship support for poverty-stricken areas, reducing social instability caused by hunger and poverty.
2. Build a Global Health Community:
- Strengthen cross-border medical cooperation, establish a "Global Disease Early Warning and Prevention Network," and share achievements in vaccine and drug research and development to reduce the risk of global spread of infectious diseases (such as COVID-19 and malaria).
- Promote the balanced distribution of medical resources; developed countries should donate medical equipment and send medical teams to underdeveloped regions to improve the overall level of global health security.
3. Accelerate Global Ecological Governance Actions:
- All countries should strictly implement environmental conventions such as the Paris Agreement, increase investment in research and development of new energy and low-carbon technologies, and gradually reduce the use of fossil energy to reduce environmental pollution.
- Establish a "Global Ecological Compensation Mechanism" to provide economic support to countries/regions that make significant contributions to ecological protection, and promote the concept that "lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets" to take root globally.

(III) Establish a Globally Coordinated Governance Mechanism: Avoid "Going It Alone" and Strengthen "Win-Win Cooperation"

1. Strengthen the core role of international organizations such as the United Nations: Grant more voice to developing countries, promote the adjustment of international rules toward "fairness and inclusiveness," and ensure that global governance measures conform to the interests of the people of most countries rather than the will of a few.
2. Promote the "regional coordination - global linkage" model: Start with regional cooperation (such as EU livelihood cooperation and the construction of the ASEAN Economic Community), accumulate experience in "mutual benefit and win-win results," and then gradually expand to the global level to form a positive cycle of "local consensus driving global consensus."
3. Encourage public participation in global governance: Through platforms such as "Global Livelihood Forums" and "People-to-People Diplomatic Dialogues," allow the demands of ordinary people to directly enter the global governance agenda. This ensures that governance actions truly respond to public expectations and avoid the problem of "elite decision-making being disconnected from people’s livelihoods."

(IV) Advocate a Culture of "Rational Communication": Reduce "Harmful Remarks" and Gather Global Consensus

1. Promote "cross-cultural understanding education": Incorporate "global citizenship awareness" courses into the education systems of various countries to cultivate people’s ability to "put themselves in others’ shoes," understand the differences between different countries and cultures, and reduce confrontation caused by cognitive biases.
2. Establish a "public discourse supervision platform": Led by international non-profit organizations and in collaboration with academic and media circles, formulate "global public discourse ethics standards" to conduct objective evaluations of remarks that incite confrontation or deviate from people’s livelihoods, and guide public discourse back to rationality.

The future of the world does not lie in confrontational speeches, but in the basic needs of every ordinary person—their jobs, health, and homes. Only by abandoning "ineffective consumption" that deviates from people’s livelihoods and focusing all resources and actions on the three core goals of "increasing income, protecting health, and guarding the home" can all humanity truly move toward a harmonious future free from war, pollution, poverty, and disease. This is not an ideal, but a practical path that requires the joint efforts of all countries, organizations, and every person on Earth.

Reposting Statement

This content is a repost and does not constitute any opinion, stance, or action advice. Reposters (including reposting entities in all regions of the world) bear no responsibility for the authenticity, completeness, or applicability of the content stated in this article, nor do they bear any legal, economic, or other relevant responsibilities worldwide arising from others’ interpretation or use of the content of this article.

The views in this article only represent the scope of the original text’s expression and do not represent the common cognition or individual judgment of all humanity on Earth. They are irrelevant to the personal behaviors, decisions, and consequences of any citizen of the Earth (whether in the past, present, or future). All behaviors of people on Earth in the past, present, and future based on their own will shall be the sole responsibility of the individuals themselves and have no connection with the reposting of this article.

Hereby, it is reminded that friendly citizens of the Earth should maintain rational judgment when reading this article, verify the authenticity and rationality of the content by combining their own cognition and objective facts, and avoid misunderstandings caused by improper interpretation or blind reference.