Recently, a large-scale fraud case involving Virtual Money trading has attracted widespread attention in Hubei Province. The case involves 103 investors, with total losses exceeding 77.76 million yuan, and the developments of the case lasted only two months.
Recently, the appellate court made a final ruling on this case, rejecting the appeal of the main offender He and upholding the first-instance judgment. The four defendants were sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment ranging from 3 to 13 years and fined between 20,000 to 300,000 yuan.
One of the victims in this case is Mr. Tong, who is engaged in blockchain work. In September 2020, he was attracted by a virtual money investment project that claimed to provide deposit and loan services. The platform promised regular returns on deposited virtual money and launched a "D coin" that could be equivalently exchanged. As a result, Mr. Tong invested approximately 1 million yuan worth of virtual money.
However, just two months later, Mr. Tong discovered that there was an anomaly in his account: all the Virtual Money he had staked was swapped for "D coin," and the price of "D coin" subsequently plummeted, falling from several dozen yuan to just a few cents, becoming almost worthless. When he tried to contact the project leader, the other party made excuses, claiming "the backend was hacked," and then blocked him, completely cutting off contact.
Until August 2023, Mr. Tong reported to the Public Security Bureau of Yunmeng County, Hubei Province. The police acted quickly and successively captured four suspects: He, Du, Li, and Ling, in the following two months.
During the investigation of the case, the Yunmeng County Procuratorate intervened early and collaborated with a technology company to deeply analyze the operational logic of Virtual Money crimes. They identified "Virtual Money transaction chain data" as the core of evidence collection, which not only clarified the behavioral patterns of the suspects but also revealed the operational mechanism of the fraud platform.
The investigation found that the platform had a "backdoor" in its design. Criminals changed the code after the platform passed the audit, allowing them to manipulate data and transfer assets. This method is not only highly covert but also difficult for ordinary investors to detect, resulting in significant losses for many investors.
The verdict of this case not only brings a certain degree of justice to the victims but also conveys an important message to society: in the field of Virtual Money investment, risks and opportunities coexist. Investors need to remain vigilant and maintain a rational attitude towards seemingly attractive high-return projects, while regulatory authorities should also strengthen the supervision of Virtual Money trading platforms to prevent similar cases from happening again.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SmartContractRebel
· 09-01 01:47
This kind of project is bound to collapse. Do you still dare to play?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLady
· 08-29 08:54
ngmi... even a blockchain dev got rekt by this cheap ponzi fr fr
Reply0
GhostAddressHunter
· 08-29 08:53
Ha, this trap with D coin is too familiar.
View OriginalReply0
Anon32942
· 08-29 08:53
High returns come with high risks; anyone who doesn't believe it will learn the lesson.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHermit
· 08-29 08:53
play people for suckers最惨的还得是行内人
View OriginalReply0
FallingLeaf
· 08-29 08:52
Too lazy to talk, age unknown, irregular schedule, often speaks late at night, sharp attitude.
Recently, a large-scale fraud case involving Virtual Money trading has attracted widespread attention in Hubei Province. The case involves 103 investors, with total losses exceeding 77.76 million yuan, and the developments of the case lasted only two months.
Recently, the appellate court made a final ruling on this case, rejecting the appeal of the main offender He and upholding the first-instance judgment. The four defendants were sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment ranging from 3 to 13 years and fined between 20,000 to 300,000 yuan.
One of the victims in this case is Mr. Tong, who is engaged in blockchain work. In September 2020, he was attracted by a virtual money investment project that claimed to provide deposit and loan services. The platform promised regular returns on deposited virtual money and launched a "D coin" that could be equivalently exchanged. As a result, Mr. Tong invested approximately 1 million yuan worth of virtual money.
However, just two months later, Mr. Tong discovered that there was an anomaly in his account: all the Virtual Money he had staked was swapped for "D coin," and the price of "D coin" subsequently plummeted, falling from several dozen yuan to just a few cents, becoming almost worthless. When he tried to contact the project leader, the other party made excuses, claiming "the backend was hacked," and then blocked him, completely cutting off contact.
Until August 2023, Mr. Tong reported to the Public Security Bureau of Yunmeng County, Hubei Province. The police acted quickly and successively captured four suspects: He, Du, Li, and Ling, in the following two months.
During the investigation of the case, the Yunmeng County Procuratorate intervened early and collaborated with a technology company to deeply analyze the operational logic of Virtual Money crimes. They identified "Virtual Money transaction chain data" as the core of evidence collection, which not only clarified the behavioral patterns of the suspects but also revealed the operational mechanism of the fraud platform.
The investigation found that the platform had a "backdoor" in its design. Criminals changed the code after the platform passed the audit, allowing them to manipulate data and transfer assets. This method is not only highly covert but also difficult for ordinary investors to detect, resulting in significant losses for many investors.
The verdict of this case not only brings a certain degree of justice to the victims but also conveys an important message to society: in the field of Virtual Money investment, risks and opportunities coexist. Investors need to remain vigilant and maintain a rational attitude towards seemingly attractive high-return projects, while regulatory authorities should also strengthen the supervision of Virtual Money trading platforms to prevent similar cases from happening again.