CSRC: In principle, different types and styles of performance benchmark equity funds should not be directly ranked or sorted by investment performance.

Jin10 data reported on October 31 that the draft for comments proposed that fund evaluation agencies should adhere to principles such as long-term, fairness, comprehensiveness, and objectivity, using performance benchmarks as an important basis for evaluating the investment management of funds. They should improve fund evaluation standards, methods, internal control systems, and business processes to scientifically measure fund investment performance, risk control capability, and style stability. Fund managers, fund sales agencies, and fund evaluation agencies should not, in principle, directly rank or order the investment performance of equity funds with different types and styles of performance benchmarks.