Kaito's algorithm has trapped the KOL?

Kaito or perhaps 正在將內容創作的評判標準變得單調,以創作者綁進一以「演算法」和「分數」為導向的系統。 (Recap: What is Kaito?) AI-Driven Crypto Intelligence Aggregation Platform: Features, Teams, and Coin Economics) (Background supplement: Will "creator tokenization" be the next 100 billion dollar narrative?) Is it "Yap-to-Earn" or "Earn-to-Leave"? In the crypto world, attention is gradually becoming an asset that can be valued. And Kaito is the InfoFi star project that has risen in this context. Backed by top-tier capital such as Dragonfly and Hongshan, Kaito was once regarded as an innovator in the "financialization of information". However, in just a few short months, more and more voices have begun to question its algorithmic mechanism and ecological impact. Kaito wants to use AI algorithms to grab users' attention, but right now, the community seems to be losing patience. The creator's ecology is ruined? Hydrological issues have been the subject of controversy since Kaito launched the "Yap-to-Earn" mechanism. The X platform is full of similar "industry in-depth analysis" posts, which are full of professional terminology and structural analysis on the surface, but in fact the content is empty, the interactive content is just a formality, and it is inefficient, repetitive, and born for profit. Community member @0xcryptoHowe used the phrase "Crypto version of elevator advertising" to describe Kaito's broadcasting mechanism. "Kaito's long-tail traffic effect is essentially like an elevator advertisement, in a closed space, constantly repeating the content, and pushing the stream at different times," he said. For the public, this is indeed a quick way to remember and expose, but the problem also arises: when the platform is taken over by "homogeneous content", KOLs are pushed by algorithms to produce over and over again, and the end result is a closed loop of information – like being locked into a "closed elevator" that never stops broadcasting advertisements, and it is difficult to access new content that is truly valuable. At the same time, Kaito's mechanism has been questioned by many people for creating the flow of authors in the middle of "white prostitution". 加密 KOL @connectfarm1 就曾指出,一些本身單條內容價值 500U 起的中waist 帳噟,因為 Kaito 卻甘願接受遠以價的回報。 這種策略在現實中不僅壓低其中容的真真實價值,也讓部分創作者只能發揮 50% Even lower expression force。 Kaito or perhaps 正在將內容創作的評判標準變得單調,以創作者綁進一以「演算法」和「分數」為導向的系統。 As community user @0xBeliever put it, "There are many criteria for kol's judgment, but kaito emerges to make it a bit singular." In addition to the mechanism controversy, the Kaito team has recently had some hiccups at the operational level. On March 16, Kaito AI 及其創辦者 Yu Hu's X account was hacked, and team member Sandra posted on the X platform, "The attacker chose to launch an attack in the middle of the night in Yu Hu's time zone, and controlled the account while it was asleep." 緊接著在 April 27 日,創辦人 Yu Hu 發文稱,平臺不小心將新演算法Backfill to 過去 12 個月,導致使用者看到較長期時間視窗,同時前端資料出現不完整的情況。 Although the two incidents themselves did not cause serious consequences, the subsequent minor flaws have also aroused concern about their stability. 「重關係」的演算法爭議 Kaito的核心賣點在於其 AI 驅動的內容評分演算法,聲稱能夠識別有價值的 Web3 內容。 However, with the in-depth use of users, this set of acting algorithms has frequently caused controversy. User @Jessethecook69 In just 24 hours, only three articles of "rubbing" content were added to the Kaito Yapper list, which ranked ninth in the world and first in the Chinese region. This makes people wonder: Is this kind of algorithm really examining valuable information? Many 使用者指出,Kaito 對閱讀量權重較低,演算法更側重高影響力帳號之間的互動表現。 Unfortunately, some ICT (Inner Crypto Twitter) have started to "huddle", further amplifying this algorithmic skew. Crypto KOL @sky_gpt bluntly said that Kaito's algorithm was essentially designed to capture the KOL institutional market, severely damaging the ecology of ordinary creators. He pointed out that the 30w dry content he wrote was almost the same as the 2k advertisement post of a single project spend money buy list, while instead of Kaito related content was systematically suppressed in the algorithm. "The top 50 KOLs on the list are full of food," he wrote, "Kaito is cutting off the path of the rise of newcomers." When newcomers are trapped in the hidden ceiling of the algorithm, when the creator is forced to cater to the preference of the algorithm, we can't help but ask:一個由 AI 驅動的內容平臺,是在重塑資訊秩序,還在複製舊有的權力邏輯? Related Reports: From Dubai to Bali: Crypto Content Creator Campus Sustains Encrypt Content Ecology Pump.fun Launches Pumpswap DEX Free Auto Migration, Will Introduce Creator Sharing, Raydium Really Broken? How did Unigraphs use smart contracts to create NFTs (Kaito's algorithm and trap KOLs? >> This article was first published in BlockTempo's "Dynamic Trends - The Most Influential Blockchain News Media".