Dasar
Spot
Perdagangkan kripto dengan bebas
Perdagangan Margin
Perbesar keuntungan Anda dengan leverage
Konversi & Investasi Otomatis
0 Fees
Perdagangkan dalam ukuran berapa pun tanpa biaya dan tanpa slippage
ETF
Dapatkan eksposur ke posisi leverage dengan mudah
Perdagangan Pre-Market
Perdagangkan token baru sebelum listing
Futures
Akses ribuan kontrak perpetual
TradFi
Emas
Satu platform aset tradisional global
Opsi
Hot
Perdagangkan Opsi Vanilla ala Eropa
Akun Terpadu
Memaksimalkan efisiensi modal Anda
Perdagangan Demo
Pengantar tentang Perdagangan Futures
Bersiap untuk perdagangan futures Anda
Acara Futures
Gabung acara & dapatkan hadiah
Perdagangan Demo
Gunakan dana virtual untuk merasakan perdagangan bebas risiko
Peluncuran
CandyDrop
Koleksi permen untuk mendapatkan airdrop
Launchpool
Staking cepat, dapatkan token baru yang potensial
HODLer Airdrop
Pegang GT dan dapatkan airdrop besar secara gratis
Launchpad
Jadi yang pertama untuk proyek token besar berikutnya
Poin Alpha
Perdagangkan aset on-chain, raih airdrop
Poin Futures
Dapatkan poin futures dan klaim hadiah airdrop
Investasi
Simple Earn
Dapatkan bunga dengan token yang menganggur
Investasi Otomatis
Investasi otomatis secara teratur
Investasi Ganda
Keuntungan dari volatilitas pasar
Soft Staking
Dapatkan hadiah dengan staking fleksibel
Pinjaman Kripto
0 Fees
Menjaminkan satu kripto untuk meminjam kripto lainnya
Pusat Peminjaman
Hub Peminjaman Terpadu
Investor files lawsuit against Lido DAO, claims unfair token control
A former investor has filed a class action lawsuit against Lido DAO in a District Court of San Francisco.
The plaintiff, Andrew Samuels, a Solano County, California resident, has filed a lawsuit over the potential mismanagement and distribution of Lido tokens The lawsuit claims that the Lido token is effectively an unregistered security, thereby making Lido DAO, along with several venture capital and investment management firms, responsible for the financial losses incurred by the plaintiffs due to the token’s decline in value.
In the lawsuit, Samuels emphasizes that a significant majority, approximately 64%, of Lido tokens are in the hands of a select few founding members and early-stage investors. These entities include notable venture capital firms such as Paradigm, AH Capital Management, Dragonfly Digital Management, and Robert Ventures. This concentration of token ownership, the plaintiff argues, has marginalized the influence of regular investors on the governance and decision-making processes within the Lido eco.
Challenge for Lido
The narrative of the lawsuit delves into the origins of Lido DAO, which initially emerged as a general partnership comprising institutional investors. Over time, the organization shifted its strategy to offer what is referred to as a ‘potential exit opportunity’ for these investors.
The shift led to the public sale of Lido tokens, facilitated by their listing on centralized cryptocurrency exchanges. It is asserted that this move attracted investments from a wide array of investors, including the plaintiff, but subsequently led to a downturn in the token’s market value, resulting in substantial losses for these investors.
The lawsuit also claims that Lido tokens may qualify as securities because a central group manages them and that investors purchased them with expectations of profit, primarily influenced by the actions and decisions of this central group.
If proven, the lawsuit makes some bold claims, which could create significant challenges for the DAO. Lido is one of the leading liquidity staking protocols in the market, with its TVL recently hitting an all-time high of $22 billion.
At the time of writing, the DAO has yet to release a statement on the issue