Dasar
Spot
Perdagangkan kripto dengan bebas
Perdagangan Margin
Perbesar keuntungan Anda dengan leverage
Konversi & Investasi Otomatis
0 Fees
Perdagangkan dalam ukuran berapa pun tanpa biaya dan tanpa slippage
ETF
Dapatkan eksposur ke posisi leverage dengan mudah
Perdagangan Pre-Market
Perdagangkan token baru sebelum listing
Futures
Akses ribuan kontrak perpetual
TradFi
Emas
Satu platform aset tradisional global
Opsi
Hot
Perdagangkan Opsi Vanilla ala Eropa
Akun Terpadu
Memaksimalkan efisiensi modal Anda
Perdagangan Demo
Pengantar tentang Perdagangan Futures
Bersiap untuk perdagangan futures Anda
Acara Futures
Gabung acara & dapatkan hadiah
Perdagangan Demo
Gunakan dana virtual untuk merasakan perdagangan bebas risiko
Peluncuran
CandyDrop
Koleksi permen untuk mendapatkan airdrop
Launchpool
Staking cepat, dapatkan token baru yang potensial
HODLer Airdrop
Pegang GT dan dapatkan airdrop besar secara gratis
Launchpad
Jadi yang pertama untuk proyek token besar berikutnya
Poin Alpha
Perdagangkan aset on-chain, raih airdrop
Poin Futures
Dapatkan poin futures dan klaim hadiah airdrop
Investasi
Simple Earn
Dapatkan bunga dengan token yang menganggur
Investasi Otomatis
Investasi otomatis secara teratur
Investasi Ganda
Keuntungan dari volatilitas pasar
Soft Staking
Dapatkan hadiah dengan staking fleksibel
Pinjaman Kripto
0 Fees
Menjaminkan satu kripto untuk meminjam kripto lainnya
Pusat Peminjaman
Hub Peminjaman Terpadu
Bitcoin ETF applicants must sport cash redemption model
The United States SEC is showing a clear preference for a cash redemption model in spot Bitcoin ETFs.
Notably, Invesco and Galaxy Digital have recently updated their filings to align with this model, indicating a broader industry shift.
This development was highlighted on Dec. 14 by finance lawyer Scott Johnsson. The updated S-1 filings of these firms now show a commitment to cash transactions to create and redeem ETF shares. This move signals a significant pivot in handling Bitcoin ETFs, contrasting with the in-kind redemption model proposed by firms like BlackRock.
The distinction between these two models lies in their operational mechanics. In a cash creation model, participants deposit cash equivalent to the net asset value of the created ETF units, which the fund then uses to purchase assets like Bitcoin (BTC). On the other hand, the in-kind model involves depositing a basket of securities that mirror the ETF’s portfolio, avoiding immediate cash transactions.
While the in-kind model is often viewed as more efficient, avoiding certain spreads and commissions, the cash model offers greater participant flexibility. Despite its potential drawbacks, such as wider spreads and tax inefficiencies, the cash model is still seen as an improvement over traditional financial platforms.
Bloomberg senior ETF analyst Eric Balchunas indicated that the SEC’s preference for the cash model is becoming increasingly evident. This trend is further substantiated by the SEC’s ongoing deliberations with ious asset managers, including BlackRock, Grayscale, and Fidelity, as they finalize their spot Bitcoin product offerings.
The SEC’s decision on approving a spot Ether ETF for Invesco and Galaxy Digital, initially slated for Dec. 13, has been postponed. However, analysts anticipate a batch approval of spot BTC products in early January.