For many years, the debate over the future of cross-border payments has been a focal point between traditional financial institutions and blockchain advocates. The two "giants" in this game – SWIFT and Ripple – are presenting very different visions of how the world will transfer money in the digital age.
SWIFT: Neutral and Common Governance
Recently, the Chief Technology Officer (CIO) of SWIFT, Mr. Tom Zschach, spoke out on LinkedIn to refute the view that "resilience comes from overcoming legal battles."
He affirmed:
"Surviving a lawsuit is not resilience. Resilience lies in neutral and shared governance."
According to Zschach, large financial institutions do not want to rely on infrastructure controlled by competitors. Instead, they need a global payment system based on common standards, built by the entire industry rather than just one company convincing regulators.
SWIFT has long played the role of the "backbone" of the international financial system with a network of tens of thousands of banks worldwide. Upgrades such as SWIFT GPI and ISO 20022 have been implemented to increase the speed and transparency of transactions. However, the processing speed of SWIFT is still regarded as slow, as it can take up to two days or longer to complete a transaction.
Ripple and XRP: Resilient After Legal Storms
On the contrary, Ripple – the company behind XRP – chose to prove its capabilities through resilience in the face of legal challenges.
For nearly 5 years facing the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), XRP has endured extremely stringent oversight. However, many analysts believe that this has made XRP "steel tempered in the red fire" – a testament to its ability to survive in a harsh legal environment.
Ripple has pursued a strategy of prioritizing regulatory compliance and cooperating with regulatory agencies worldwide. Company:
Currently applying for MiCA license in Europe through the branch in Luxembourg. Has received Major Payments Institution (MPI) license from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).
This shows that Ripple is not only focused on speed or cost, but also places emphasis on legality and compatibility with the traditional financial system.
Technological Advantage: XRP Surpasses SWIFT
In terms of technical efficiency, XRP is almost superior to SWIFT:
Transaction processing time: 3–5 seconds on the XRP Ledger, 10,000 times faster than the SWIFT system. On-Demand Liquidity (ODL): removes intermediaries, helping to reduce costs and increase liquidity. Scalable infrastructure: Over 300 institutional partners are connected to the Ripple system, supporting fiat payments 24/7 globally.
Meanwhile, SWIFT still relies on a multi-tier correspondent banking model, which is costly and slow.
Geopolitical Factors: BRICS and the Anti-Dollar Trend
A new factor strongly influencing the global payment landscape is BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, along with many other countries).
These countries want to reduce dependence on the USD and the SWIFT system, thereby building a financial mechanism that better reflects their political and economic status. In this context, XRP is seen as a potential option due to its fast, cheap, and non-reliant payment capabilities on a single nation.
On social media X (Twitter), a viewpoint is spreading within the crypto community:
"When BRICS separates the banking system from the West, SWIFT will suffer significant losses. XRP is likely to be the solution."
Who Will Win the Global Payment Story?
Currently, SWIFT still dominates the traditional banking network. But Ripple is building a different story, where blockchain technology brings faster speeds, lower costs, and greater flexibility.
This competition is not just about technology, but also about trust, compliance, and geopolitics.
SWIFT: based on reputation, neutrality, and global consensus. Ripple: leveraging technological advantages, clearer legal frameworks, and the demand for de-dollarization in emerging economic blocs.
Clearly, in an era where global finance is shifting rapidly, the question is no longer SWIFT or Ripple, but whether these two systems will coexist or one will replace the other.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The Global Race in Cross-Border Payments: SWIFT or Ripple (XRP) Will Prevail?
For many years, the debate over the future of cross-border payments has been a focal point between traditional financial institutions and blockchain advocates. The two "giants" in this game – SWIFT and Ripple – are presenting very different visions of how the world will transfer money in the digital age. SWIFT: Neutral and Common Governance Recently, the Chief Technology Officer (CIO) of SWIFT, Mr. Tom Zschach, spoke out on LinkedIn to refute the view that "resilience comes from overcoming legal battles." He affirmed: "Surviving a lawsuit is not resilience. Resilience lies in neutral and shared governance." According to Zschach, large financial institutions do not want to rely on infrastructure controlled by competitors. Instead, they need a global payment system based on common standards, built by the entire industry rather than just one company convincing regulators. SWIFT has long played the role of the "backbone" of the international financial system with a network of tens of thousands of banks worldwide. Upgrades such as SWIFT GPI and ISO 20022 have been implemented to increase the speed and transparency of transactions. However, the processing speed of SWIFT is still regarded as slow, as it can take up to two days or longer to complete a transaction. Ripple and XRP: Resilient After Legal Storms On the contrary, Ripple – the company behind XRP – chose to prove its capabilities through resilience in the face of legal challenges. For nearly 5 years facing the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), XRP has endured extremely stringent oversight. However, many analysts believe that this has made XRP "steel tempered in the red fire" – a testament to its ability to survive in a harsh legal environment. Ripple has pursued a strategy of prioritizing regulatory compliance and cooperating with regulatory agencies worldwide. Company: Currently applying for MiCA license in Europe through the branch in Luxembourg. Has received Major Payments Institution (MPI) license from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). This shows that Ripple is not only focused on speed or cost, but also places emphasis on legality and compatibility with the traditional financial system. Technological Advantage: XRP Surpasses SWIFT In terms of technical efficiency, XRP is almost superior to SWIFT: Transaction processing time: 3–5 seconds on the XRP Ledger, 10,000 times faster than the SWIFT system. On-Demand Liquidity (ODL): removes intermediaries, helping to reduce costs and increase liquidity. Scalable infrastructure: Over 300 institutional partners are connected to the Ripple system, supporting fiat payments 24/7 globally. Meanwhile, SWIFT still relies on a multi-tier correspondent banking model, which is costly and slow. Geopolitical Factors: BRICS and the Anti-Dollar Trend A new factor strongly influencing the global payment landscape is BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, along with many other countries). These countries want to reduce dependence on the USD and the SWIFT system, thereby building a financial mechanism that better reflects their political and economic status. In this context, XRP is seen as a potential option due to its fast, cheap, and non-reliant payment capabilities on a single nation. On social media X (Twitter), a viewpoint is spreading within the crypto community: "When BRICS separates the banking system from the West, SWIFT will suffer significant losses. XRP is likely to be the solution." Who Will Win the Global Payment Story? Currently, SWIFT still dominates the traditional banking network. But Ripple is building a different story, where blockchain technology brings faster speeds, lower costs, and greater flexibility. This competition is not just about technology, but also about trust, compliance, and geopolitics. SWIFT: based on reputation, neutrality, and global consensus. Ripple: leveraging technological advantages, clearer legal frameworks, and the demand for de-dollarization in emerging economic blocs. Clearly, in an era where global finance is shifting rapidly, the question is no longer SWIFT or Ripple, but whether these two systems will coexist or one will replace the other.