SC Ends Four-Decade-Old M.C. Mehta Cases, Registers Suo Moto Case On Delhi-NCR Pollution

RunWithRugs · 2026-03-14T16:53:33+00:00

The Supreme Court disposed of the M.C. Mehta vs Union of India environmental case after nearly 40 years, initiating new proceedings on air pollution in the National Capital Region and halting further applications in the old case.

RunWithRugs

2026-03-14 16:53:33

Đang tạo bản tóm tắt

(MENAFN- IANS) New Delhi, March 12 (IANS) The Supreme Court on Thursday formally disposed of the four-decade-old environmental case M.C. Mehta vs Union of India and directed that issues relating to air pollution in the National Capital Region (NCR) be dealt with under fresh suo motu proceedings.

A bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant ordered that no further interlocutory applications (IAs) would be entertained in the 1985 matter and directed the apex court registry to register a new case titled “In Re: Issues of Air Pollution in the National Capital Region”.

“We formally dispose of Writ Petition (Civil) No. 13029/1985, MC Mehta vs Union of India. No IAs shall be entertained in the case,” ordered the bench, also comprising Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul Pancholi.

It directed that all pending interlocutory applications in the old case be registered as separate writ petitions under the newly initiated suo motu proceedings dealing specifically with air pollution in the Delhi-NCR.

The CJI-led Bench clarified that the top court registry should treat each pending application independently and assign separate writ petition numbers for their consideration under the new suo motu proceedings.

Earlier, the apex court had expressed concern over the “endless litigation” continuing under various matters titled MC Mehta vs Union of India.

The CJI-led Bench observed that repeated filing of interlocutory and miscellaneous applications had created the misleading impression that several decades-old cases were still pending.

“What is happening in this court? IA after IA is being filed… MC Mehta alone has 85 pending ones. Then you will ask Parliament how many cases are pending before us. We will not go through such embarrassment,” the bench had remarked.

The Supreme Court had then directed an exercise to identify and re-caption old environmental matters so that disposed petitions are not treated as continuing litigation.

MENAFN12032026000231011071ID1110853110

Trang này có thể chứa nội dung của bên thứ ba, được cung cấp chỉ nhằm mục đích thông tin (không phải là tuyên bố/bảo đảm) và không được coi là sự chứng thực cho quan điểm của Gate hoặc là lời khuyên về tài chính hoặc chuyên môn. Xem Tuyên bố từ chối trách nhiệm để biết chi tiết.