Market making is prevalent, let's talk about my views, I'll say whatever comes to mind.

1️⃣
The announcement of the market maker itself is not really a problem; the key issue is the presence of greedy retail investors. Once the addresses associated with the market maker are monitored, it will naturally affect the market and its height.

In addition, market maker and conspiracy address > leads to frequent address changes > the difficulty index of continuing to market make increases.

Address association, randomness of source, time, and amount, the future market maker's chips will be more concealed, and the guillotine will not decrease, only increase.

What is the solution? There is a platform that specializes in a one-click analysis panel for market maker chip structure and dynamic changes, providing an estimated range for each value for users to refer to.

This AI analysis must include the basic chip clusters, the market maker addresses, the conspiracy group addresses, as well as their chip transfers and wash trading, and all suspicious addresses/clusters should be marked (since we want to achieve data equity, could we open source the AI algorithm and have the community maintain and upgrade it together?)

The final result is that the on-chain data is completely transparent, how much the market maker has, how much the retail investors have, it's all clear. There's no need to look at anything else, it's purely a gamble on the strength and layout of the market maker. Since it's a market maker's game, images, names, narratives, etc. are no longer important. Here, we not only have to ask, is this still a meme?

2️⃣
In the foreign community, it seems there is no habit of taking advantage of market makers, just looking at whether this meme is interesting or fun. You can play for a long time with just 10u, and there are quite a few skilled traders who have made a lot of money with 10u. It's fun, interesting, and can make money.

It seems that the Chinese-speaking region is more prone to internal competition, where retail investors compete against each other without taking over each other's positions, retail investors rush to buy while market makers do not push the market and point fingers at the market makers, and platforms engage in homogeneous competition with each other, etc. However, there is no need to worry; these are all products of marketization. When things reach an extreme (when no one can survive), new things will inevitably emerge, or we will return to a previous state.

3️⃣
In the end, my opinion is

Before any platform launches algorithms and functions, where everyone starts on the same starting line (retail investors, whales, conspiracies, market makers), the behavior of exposing market makers needs to be moderate and is more suitable for projects with extremely large market capitalization. Currently, it is indeed very easy for projects with low market capitalization to be taken down.

Meme is a good thing, providing monetary and emotional value. I hope to have both, and that it can last long. I also hope everyone can maintain a good track to achieve bigger and longer-lasting success. #memeNeverSleeps