On June 9th, Jin10 data reported that currently more than 180 ETFs have a daily trading volume of less than one million yuan, with some ETFs even having a daily trading volume of less than ten thousand yuan, indicating that liquidity is on the brink of exhaustion. Looking at past developments, whenever popular indices are released, numerous fund companies rush to position themselves, but the Matthew effect of ETFs is very pronounced; leading ETFs have scales exceeding 100 billion yuan, while trailing products struggle on the "death line." Behind the "ice and fire" dichotomy lies a dual dilemma of homogeneous competition and lack of innovation. For the ETF market with a total scale exceeding 40 trillion yuan, how to use differentiated innovation to break the homogeneous competition is worth considering.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The daily trading volume is less than one million, and the liquidity of over 180 ETFs is concerning.
On June 9th, Jin10 data reported that currently more than 180 ETFs have a daily trading volume of less than one million yuan, with some ETFs even having a daily trading volume of less than ten thousand yuan, indicating that liquidity is on the brink of exhaustion. Looking at past developments, whenever popular indices are released, numerous fund companies rush to position themselves, but the Matthew effect of ETFs is very pronounced; leading ETFs have scales exceeding 100 billion yuan, while trailing products struggle on the "death line." Behind the "ice and fire" dichotomy lies a dual dilemma of homogeneous competition and lack of innovation. For the ETF market with a total scale exceeding 40 trillion yuan, how to use differentiated innovation to break the homogeneous competition is worth considering.